SSenZy LLove — CS2 Stats

76561198040110247[U:1:79844519]✓ No bans

3,393Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,233Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1595 of 17390 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,683 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSSenZy LLoveFACEITLevel 10 · 2,683 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,233 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateWLLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression7.0
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time579ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy27.2%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — dust2 6–0
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26131350%-0.01
dust2C2081240%-0.00
infernoS1711665%0.02
cacheS118373%0.03
ancientA106460%0.00
nukeD72529%-0.02
anubisS75271%0.01
overpass21150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,432Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25649%0.9915.4
Dust221458%1.1416.8
Ancient17249%1.1616.3
Anubis16252%1.0716.0
Inferno15157%1.1916.1
Nuke6244%1.0815.8
Vertigo4661%1.3014.7
Overpass3834%1.0214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
579msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
46.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.44HE damage / grenade
9.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9036% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0230%27 Aug
dust20–130.0118%27 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0323%27 Aug
mirage16–140.0525%27 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0243%26 Aug
cache16–130.0524%26 Aug
dust26–130.0129%25 Aug
mirage0–7-0.0138%25 Aug
anubis13–30.0425%25 Aug
mirage1–13-0.05100%24 Aug
ancient0–20.000%24 Aug
mirage13–30.0043%24 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0618%23 Aug
anubis13–110.0223%23 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0539%23 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0940%16 Aug
mirage2–130.0331%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0511%16 Aug
dust213–8-0.1444%16 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0718%12 Aug
cache13–10.0317%11 Aug
mirage14–160.0224%11 Aug
inferno13–20.0118%11 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0233%11 Aug
mirage13–10.0925%11 Aug
inferno13–70.1526%11 Aug
cache13–70.0218%11 Aug
dust213–5-0.059%10 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0122%10 Aug
inferno13–10.0223%8 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0136%8 Aug
ancient2–10.108%6 Aug
cache13–80.0518%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0216%6 Aug
ancient13–70.0014%4 Aug
inferno6–13-0.084%4 Aug
nuke3–13-0.1324%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0314%1 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0936%29 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0825%28 Jul
anubis13–1-0.0116%28 Jul
mirage13–70.0225%28 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0144%26 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0218%25 Jul
cache4–110.0435%25 Jul
cache13–80.0028%14 Jul
dust213–11-0.0330%14 Jul
dust25–13-0.0824%14 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0225%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0318%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0414%13 Jul
dust213–16-0.0340%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0521%12 Jul
dust213–100.0118%12 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0516%12 Jul
mirage6–12-0.060%10 Jul
anubis13–80.0412%10 Jul
cache13–80.0216%10 Jul
dust211–130.0218%10 Jul
cache13–00.058%10 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0217%10 Jul
inferno13–50.0323%10 Jul
cache13–60.1419%10 Jul
dust213–110.1216%10 Jul
dust210–130.0320%9 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0327%6 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0116%5 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0415%5 Jul
dust215–15-0.0240%4 Jul
dust27–13-0.0515%4 Jul
inferno16–140.0332%4 Jul
inferno8–130.0715%4 Jul
mirage15–150.0628%4 Jul
nuke13–60.0423%4 Jul
dust20–13-0.0543%4 Jul
dust213–30.0323%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0725%1 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0142%30 Jun
inferno13–50.0836%29 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0120%29 Jun
mirage13–00.00100%29 Jun
anubis9–130.0220%29 Jun
inferno13–110.0525%26 Jun
ancient13–70.0619%26 Jun
dust26–130.0820%26 Jun
inferno0–8-0.020%26 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0220%26 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0310%17 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0118%9 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0318%9 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0119%5 Jun
inferno13–1-0.0238%5 Jun
inferno13–50.0429%1 Jun
anubis13–60.0026%18 May
dust26–00.2418%17 May
mirage13–110.0824%17 May
dust210–13-0.0218%16 May
nuke13–70.0320%15 May
mirage13–110.0822%15 May
overpass13–60.1420%15 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →