Taehaechi — CS2 Stats

76561198035809904[U:1:75544176]✓ No bans

4,058Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,634Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#332 of 8747 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,520 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTaehaechiFACEITLevel 10 · 2,520 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,634 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning61
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59374Last 10059%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7
Aggression6.0
Utility6.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time504ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — nuke 5–0
131Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
W6Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%0.02
anubisA2113862%0.01
mirageC1971237%0.02
ancientS1611569%0.02
nukeS86275%0.06
infernoS65183%0.01
cache42250%0.03
vertigo110100%0.00
train1010%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,556Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
83.2ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31751%1.0615.8
Ancient30653%1.1918.1
Anubis26354%1.2017.3
Vertigo13652%1.1016.6
Inferno13351%1.1716.8
Nuke12052%1.2117.2
Dust210947%1.0416.1
Overpass5954%1.1616.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
503msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
8.68HE damage / grenade
11.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2206% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–8-0.0014%27 Aug
dust213–70.0138%27 Aug
vertigo16–140.0017%25 Aug
anubis13–40.0024%25 Aug
dust213–80.0825%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0217%25 Aug
cache6–130.0018%25 Aug
ancient10–130.0137%25 Aug
dust213–50.0326%25 Aug
nuke13–90.0318%25 Aug
inferno12–120.0521%22 Aug
train12–120.1245%22 Aug
ancient6–130.0324%21 Aug
anubis13–60.1626%21 Aug
dust22–13-0.0728%21 Aug
ancient13–90.1226%21 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0419%20 Aug
mirage7–130.0421%20 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0213%19 Aug
mirage13–90.0116%19 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0332%19 Aug
dust213–50.0019%19 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0529%19 Aug
ancient16–120.0514%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0128%19 Aug
dust213–11-0.0213%18 Aug
ancient13–100.0123%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0216%18 Aug
ancient13–60.0116%18 Aug
ancient13–40.0216%18 Aug
dust27–130.0324%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0229%17 Aug
dust213–10.0522%17 Aug
ancient13–50.0125%17 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0519%17 Aug
ancient11–130.0428%17 Aug
mirage13–50.0522%17 Aug
anubis13–100.0024%16 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0424%16 Aug
mirage13–50.0441%16 Aug
cache13–50.1225%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0726%16 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0324%16 Aug
dust213–110.0114%15 Aug
anubis13–80.0524%15 Aug
mirage10–130.0215%15 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0022%15 Aug
dust24–130.0432%14 Aug
dust213–110.0326%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0323%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0024%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0525%14 Aug
mirage13–90.0435%12 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0124%10 Aug
ancient16–130.0321%10 Aug
dust213–70.0823%10 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0138%10 Aug
ancient13–10.0614%10 Aug
anubis13–80.0525%10 Aug
ancient12–160.0516%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0214%10 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0017%9 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0813%9 Aug
anubis15–190.0518%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0522%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0729%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0816%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0517%8 Aug
anubis13–100.0316%7 Aug
nuke13–90.0613%7 Aug
nuke5–00.2513%7 Aug
inferno13–100.0217%7 Aug
dust216–130.0624%7 Aug
dust28–13-0.0419%7 Aug
mirage10–130.0228%7 Aug
dust29–130.1036%7 Aug
dust27–130.1018%7 Aug
dust24–130.0121%7 Aug
dust213–4-0.0432%7 Aug
anubis13–60.0628%7 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0123%6 Aug
anubis0–3-0.19100%5 Aug
dust216–140.0329%4 Aug
nuke13–70.1636%4 Aug
mirage11–130.0723%4 Aug
cache7–130.0627%4 Aug
nuke3–130.0429%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0124%3 Aug
dust215–150.0818%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0316%3 Aug
dust216–130.0020%3 Aug
anubis13–70.0418%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0120%3 Aug
mirage15–150.0421%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0516%2 Aug
inferno13–110.0722%30 Jul
mirage8–00.0715%30 Jul
mirage5–130.0518%27 Jul
anubis13–70.1018%27 Jul
cache13–5-0.0625%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →