CONFUSEN_- — CS2 Stats

76561198034432827[U:1:74167099]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,563Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning67

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateWLWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7

Aggression8.1

Utility5.3

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning6.7

Utility5.3

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time505ms−24ms

first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms

Headshot accuracy17.6%+1.9%

first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — overpass 13–11

13–1Biggest win — train

5Longest win streak

13–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	20	9–11	45%	0.02
cache	C	16	7–9	44%	0.01
dust2	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.00
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
inferno	A	11	6–5	55%	0.03
mirage	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.01
vertigo	S	7	5–2	71%	0.03
ancient	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	0.03
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,125Matches

53%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

78.1ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	134	49%	1.26	16.6
Mirage	129	51%	1.10	15.7
Anubis	118	50%	1.12	14.9
Nuke	115	66%	1.35	16.6
Ancient	72	49%	1.04	16.2
Vertigo	39	44%	1.20	17.6
Dust2	28	29%	1.02	14.2
Overpass	16	38%	1.01	14.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy

35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

83.4%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

505msReaction time

30.0%T opening success

51.5%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

7.1%Flash assists

9.23HE damage / grenade

7.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4814 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.0146% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–4	-0.02	21%	28 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	20%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	12%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	11%	27 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.02	16%	27 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	18%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	26%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.01	17%	23 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	19%	23 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.01	16%	23 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.07	19%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	16%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	16%	22 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.04	21%	22 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	17%	22 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.04	13%	22 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.02	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.03	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.01	18%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	11%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	12%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.01	12%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.09	13%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	28%	31 May →
train	13–1	0.01	32%	31 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	10%	29 May →
nuke	4–13	0.06	20%	29 May →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	22%	29 May →
cache	13–5	-0.01	16%	28 May →
inferno	9–13	0.03	21%	28 May →
vertigo	13–10	-0.01	16%	28 May →
anubis	13–5	0.04	16%	27 May →
ancient	11–13	0.03	8%	26 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	18%	26 May →
cache	13–10	-0.05	22%	26 May →
nuke	13–3	0.08	17%	25 May →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	12%	25 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.09	6%	25 May →
dust2	16–13	0.04	15%	25 May →
inferno	9–13	0.02	16%	25 May →
cache	13–5	0.02	19%	23 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	13%	22 May →
overpass	5–13	-0.05	13%	22 May →
nuke	6–13	0.01	16%	22 May →
dust2	13–11	0.00	21%	21 May →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	16%	21 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	19%	20 May →
overpass	13–11	0.07	13%	16 May →
nuke	7–13	0.01	21%	15 May →
inferno	13–8	0.12	18%	15 May →
mirage	13–8	0.03	8%	13 May →
nuke	11–13	0.08	15%	13 May →
ancient	13–6	0.04	16%	13 May →
nuke	13–7	0.03	11%	8 May →
cache	4–13	-0.01	20%	8 May →
mirage	15–15	-0.05	22%	8 May →
inferno	13–11	0.01	18%	8 May →
nuke	13–10	0.04	12%	8 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	35%	6 May →
anubis	13–5	0.02	29%	6 May →
mirage	9–13	0.00	21%	6 May →
cache	8–13	-0.01	13%	3 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	16%	3 May →
anubis	12–16	-0.02	14%	2 May →
cache	9–13	0.05	14%	30 Apr →
cache	4–13	-0.09	8%	29 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.12	24%	29 Apr →
cache	11–13	0.02	27%	29 Apr →
cache	2–13	-0.04	6%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	0.01	13%	29 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.16	13%	28 Apr →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	13%	28 Apr →
ancient	13–5	0.02	22%	26 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	19%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–1	0.06	18%	25 Apr →
vertigo	13–1	0.06	17%	24 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	11%	24 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.04	16%	20 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.01	17%	20 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.03	10%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–16	0.03	15%	16 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.10	11%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.02	21%	16 Apr →
vertigo	12–12	-0.00	25%	15 Apr →
dust2	5–13	0.09	25%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	14%	12 Apr →
vertigo	13–6	-0.03	20%	11 Apr →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	15%	11 Apr →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	10%	10 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	17%	10 Apr →
vertigo	13–7	0.10	23%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–16	-0.01	12%	10 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	16%	10 Apr →
anubis	13–5	0.04	13%	10 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.00	6%	10 Apr →
vertigo	13–3	0.09	10%	3 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	13%	3 Apr →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	18%	3 Apr →