Reze — CS2 Stats

GB76561198033704799[U:1:73439071]Steam profile ↗

5,347Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning47

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–41–7Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWLLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5

Aggression5.0

Utility3.1

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning4.7

Utility3.1

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time644ms−84ms

first ⅓ avg 728ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms

Headshot accuracy29.1%−10.6%

first ⅓ avg 39.7% → last ⅓ avg 29.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — poseidon 9–0

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 24anubisWeakest map · 35% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	24	15–9	63%	0.00
anubis	C	17	6–11	35%	-0.00
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.00
ancient	B	14	7–7	50%	0.00
cache	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.01
dust2	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
poseidon	—	3	2–1	67%	0.13
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,446Matches

50%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

85.8ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	241	49%	1.06	17.5
Anubis	235	56%	1.09	17.8
Mirage	188	48%	1.08	17.5
Dust2	148	50%	1.02	17.3
Nuke	123	60%	1.18	17.1
Inferno	92	37%	0.95	16.5
Train	48	48%	1.41	17.0
Vertigo	46	50%	1.00	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.5%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

87.5%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

642msReaction time

25.7%T opening success

51.4%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

12.16HE damage / grenade

1.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 1.9278 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.7% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	3–13	-0.07	26%	1 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.02	29%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	35%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.02	26%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.07	37%	30 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.00	29%	30 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	26%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	27%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–2	-0.06	18%	27 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	28%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.09	33%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.03	21%	26 Jun →
cache	13–11	-0.01	53%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	26%	26 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.07	45%	26 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.03	19%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.01	35%	26 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.01	47%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.01	22%	23 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	33%	23 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	33%	22 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.01	35%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.11	40%	22 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	14%	22 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.09	16%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.01	20%	20 Jun →
nuke	16–12	0.03	27%	20 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	36%	19 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	18%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	25%	17 Jun →
ancient	12–16	0.00	25%	17 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.01	38%	17 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	22%	17 Jun →
mirage	6–13	0.01	23%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.03	20%	16 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	18%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.06	34%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	18%	13 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	28%	13 Jun →
ancient	15–15	0.02	29%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.09	36%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.06	49%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.02	40%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.07	33%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–2	-0.03	25%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.03	18%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.02	34%	1 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	45%	1 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.03	30%	31 May →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	24%	31 May →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	31%	31 May →
mirage	13–10	0.00	26%	31 May →
ancient	10–13	0.03	32%	28 May →
nuke	15–15	0.02	34%	28 May →
dust2	6–13	0.01	41%	28 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	28%	23 May →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	33%	23 May →
nuke	16–14	-0.01	27%	21 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	37%	21 May →
nuke	10–13	0.03	40%	18 May →
cache	12–2	-0.02	50%	10 May →
inferno	13–2	0.04	27%	8 May →
cache	7–13	-0.04	17%	2 May →
cache	8–13	-0.01	65%	2 May →
nuke	8–13	0.01	38%	2 May →
cache	8–13	-0.04	28%	2 May →
mirage	15–15	0.04	23%	1 May →
cache	13–8	-0.03	37%	1 May →
cache	13–5	-0.03	55%	1 May →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	13%	30 Apr →
cache	13–9	0.06	24%	30 Apr →
cache	4–13	0.01	55%	30 Apr →
cache	7–13	-0.01	58%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	-0.03	67%	29 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	30%	26 Apr →
train	13–5	-0.00	50%	26 Apr →
inferno	5–13	0.00	45%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.01	51%	20 Apr →
ancient	4–0	-0.06	33%	20 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.06	43%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	32%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	44%	1 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.01	49%	31 Mar →
anubis	13–3	0.08	33%	31 Mar →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	36%	31 Mar →
ancient	6–13	0.01	43%	7 Mar →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	11%	7 Mar →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	29%	3 Mar →
anubis	6–13	0.02	52%	22 Feb →
anubis	13–5	0.04	47%	22 Feb →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	21%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	19 Feb →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	46%	19 Feb →
anubis	16–13	-0.00	28%	13 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	42%	13 Feb →
anubis	7–13	0.04	35%	13 Feb →
ancient	13–5	0.03	33%	13 Feb →
poseidon	9–3	0.14	40%	13 Feb →
poseidon	9–0	0.17	59%	13 Feb →
poseidon	8–8	0.08	52%	13 Feb →