♤ remarcable

♤ remarcable — CS2 Stats

DE76561198033109977[U:1:72844249]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

552Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,570Purple band · top ~26.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31355 of 53959 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♤ remarcableFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,570 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning25
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43525Last 10043%Win rateWWLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression3.7
Utility3.1
Positioning2.5
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning2.5
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time603ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+5.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 13–2
130Biggest win — dust2
3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C37152241%0.00
infernoC146843%-0.01
nukeA117464%-0.00
ancientC94544%-0.04
vertigoS86275%0.02
mirageD72529%-0.02
anubisD51420%0.04
train41325%0.01
edin21150%-0.05
cache1010%-0.02
basalt1010%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
611msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
8.97HE damage / grenade
7.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7513% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10-0.0028%30 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0113%30 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1236%22 Jul
dust212–40.0026%21 Jul
mirage13–20.0423%21 Jul
dust210–130.0126%20 Jul
dust24–130.0033%18 Jul
dust213–16-0.0020%17 Jul
cache11–13-0.0223%12 May
dust22–13-0.0623%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0519%17 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0420%16 Apr
inferno4–130.0424%15 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0732%11 Apr
dust213–7-0.0225%8 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0119%31 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0018%30 Mar
ancient8–130.0122%28 Mar
inferno13–80.0317%25 Mar
dust28–13-0.0315%18 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0722%8 Mar
anubis5–130.0123%7 Mar
dust24–13-0.0613%6 Mar
mirage11–13-0.058%4 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0122%24 Feb
dust22–13-0.0617%20 Feb
dust213–70.0323%13 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0139%13 Feb
inferno5–13-0.1041%11 Feb
dust213–90.0620%10 Feb
mirage10–13-0.042%4 Feb
dust215–15-0.0012%2 Feb
anubis13–20.1826%1 Feb
inferno13–50.1016%1 Feb
dust213–10-0.038%1 Feb
dust212–160.0317%30 Jan
dust213–6-0.0219%27 Jan
dust212–160.0516%26 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0519%25 Jan
mirage13–100.0916%23 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0817%22 Jan
dust22–130.0129%21 Jan
dust213–30.0417%16 Jan
nuke15–15-0.0113%16 Jan
edin12–12-0.0219%15 Jan
dust29–130.0141%9 Jan
nuke16–12-0.0014%24 Dec
dust210–13-0.0239%23 Dec
nuke13–50.0124%22 Dec
dust29–130.0712%17 Dec
dust213–11-0.0517%17 Dec
dust27–130.0313%15 Dec
nuke13–90.0314%10 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0124%10 Dec
nuke13–70.0624%6 Dec
train13–90.0427%6 Dec
dust213–60.0431%6 Dec
inferno12–16-0.0523%6 Dec
train7–130.0223%5 Dec
dust212–120.0119%5 Dec
nuke13–100.0410%4 Dec
dust23–13-0.0636%4 Dec
edin13–6-0.0724%1 Dec
dust213–7-0.0225%1 Dec
nuke12–12-0.0217%27 Nov
dust213–6-0.0216%27 Nov
train9–130.0020%27 Nov
inferno7–20.0618%27 Nov
nuke13–70.0118%26 Nov
basalt5–13-0.0224%26 Nov
train5–13-0.0115%26 Nov
inferno0–13-0.170%4 Oct
dust29–130.0125%24 Sept
dust211–130.0313%24 Sept
dust29–130.0719%24 Sept
dust213–00.0219%23 Sept
dust213–100.0317%19 Sept
dust213–70.1228%17 Sept
dust20–8-0.0613%15 Sept
dust25–12-0.0216%15 Sept
inferno4–130.0214%14 Aug
vertigo13–70.0333%15 Jul
vertigo13–30.0928%10 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0714%8 Jan
vertigo13–60.079%8 Jan
anubis9–130.0218%8 Jan
vertigo16–130.0420%7 Jan
ancient7–13-0.088%21 Dec
anubis3–130.0013%21 Dec
vertigo9–13-0.0313%14 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0719%11 Dec
vertigo9–13-0.0624%11 Dec
anubis8–130.0113%10 Dec
vertigo13–110.0111%10 Dec
vertigo13–10.0424%8 Dec
ancient13–8-0.0412%8 Dec
inferno3–13-0.0510%8 Dec
ancient16–14-0.025%8 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0129%7 Dec
inferno13–9-0.0113%2 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →