h44 — CS2 Stats

76561198028819354[U:1:68553626]✓ No bans

1,370Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating25,379Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2459 of 19303 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,073 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning73

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–41–8Last 10051%Win rateLWWWTLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.8

Aggression10.0

Utility4.4

Positioning7.3

Opening Duels6.9

Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning7.3

Utility4.4

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels6.9

Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time561ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms

Headshot accuracy23.9%+2.6%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — nuke 5–9

13–1Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6cacheWeakest map · 44% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	0.02
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	0.04
cache	C	18	8–10	44%	0.02
anubis	B	17	9–8	53%	0.05
dust2	B	13	7–6	54%	0.04
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.04
nuke	S	6	4–2	67%	0.07
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

683Matches

54%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

86.9ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	111	51%	1.11	16.9
Dust2	62	50%	1.24	17.6
Anubis	53	70%	1.55	19.4
Inferno	45	58%	1.31	18.3
Ancient	16	56%	1.12	17.5
Nuke	16	38%	1.28	19.2
Overpass	12	83%	1.29	18.3
Train	4	75%	1.61	19.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy

39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.5%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

565msReaction time

45.9%T opening success

69.4%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

8.5%Flash assists

7.09HE damage / grenade

6.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4671 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–9	-0.06	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	15%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	38%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	25%	13 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.02	22%	12 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	35%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.15	27%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	14%	12 Aug →
inferno	0–13	-0.03	29%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.13	23%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	17%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.06	28%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.12	38%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.05	18%	11 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	23%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.03	23%	11 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	20%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.10	28%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	25%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	27%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.06	28%	9 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.07	20%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.11	21%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.06	27%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	20%	8 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.03	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.11	18%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	22%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.08	22%	8 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.13	31%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.03	25%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	23%	8 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.03	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	23%	7 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.01	32%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.11	26%	7 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.01	11%	7 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	23%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.04	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.00	19%	2 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.03	31%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.01	31%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	19%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	46%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	19%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.04	25%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.15	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.10	13%	31 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	19%	31 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.01	29%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–9	0.08	37%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.15	26%	30 Jul →
inferno	2–4	0.04	40%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	21%	30 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.09	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	16%	29 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.05	29%	29 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.17	15%	29 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	24%	16 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.06	24%	16 Jul →
nuke	5–9	0.18	19%	16 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.06	27%	16 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.04	12%	16 Jul →
anubis	1–4	0.07	13%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	15%	15 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.07	21%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.01	30%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.08	29%	15 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	24%	14 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	12%	14 Jul →
mirage	6–12	-0.06	8%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	31%	12 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	19%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.11	32%	11 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	16%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	11%	10 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.08	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	31%	10 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.06	50%	9 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	6%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	18%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.05	29%	9 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.01	22%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.06	10%	8 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.12	23%	8 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.09	15%	7 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	28%	7 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	22%	7 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.03	20%	7 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	23%	7 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.02	19%	7 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	15%	3 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.01	14%	3 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.02	15%	2 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.08	18%	2 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.05	18%	1 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.07	35%	1 Jul →