toooast

toooast — CS2 Stats

ES76561198021782755[U:1:61517027]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,991Tracked matches28%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,085 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtoooastFACEITLevel 5 · 1,085 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning49
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41545Last 10041%Win rateLWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression7.0
Utility7.0
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.9
Utility7.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time650ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–7
132Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC23101343%-0.01
dust2C2281436%0.00
mirageD1431121%-0.02
anubisS1410471%0.01
ancientD124833%-0.02
nukeC104640%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.01
cache21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,491Matches
49%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
79.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage45249%0.9314.8
Vertigo21650%0.9615.0
Anubis21447%0.9615.0
Inferno17150%0.9714.7
Ancient15745%0.9114.9
Dust210852%0.9715.3
Nuke6445%0.9815.7
Overpass3546%0.9313.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
636msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
13.0%Flash assists
6.96HE damage / grenade
16.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1417% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0033%28 Jul
inferno9–00.1160%28 Jul
dust25–130.0231%23 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0428%23 Jul
ancient8–130.0314%21 Jul
ancient5–13-0.015%21 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0115%21 Jul
cache6–13-0.0331%20 Jul
nuke13–50.0116%20 Jul
cache13–9-0.057%20 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0613%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0119%5 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0114%5 Jun
inferno13–70.0733%4 Jun
anubis13–30.0029%4 Jun
dust210–130.0225%4 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0519%25 May
inferno6–13-0.0525%25 May
mirage8–13-0.0427%22 May
inferno6–13-0.0526%21 May
anubis16–120.0320%21 May
dust29–13-0.0515%20 May
dust216–140.0023%20 May
inferno15–150.0316%20 May
mirage11–130.0211%20 May
inferno4–13-0.0519%20 May
mirage9–13-0.0424%20 May
ancient3–13-0.0722%20 May
inferno16–12-0.0214%20 May
dust212–16-0.0135%19 May
nuke13–90.0624%19 May
dust22–13-0.0820%19 May
anubis16–13-0.0320%19 May
inferno13–60.0521%19 May
dust23–130.0120%19 May
dust27–13-0.0128%18 May
anubis13–100.0322%18 May
anubis13–100.0522%18 May
nuke15–15-0.0022%18 May
mirage13–110.0225%18 May
dust26–13-0.0215%18 May
mirage8–13-0.0419%17 May
inferno13–2-0.0126%17 May
mirage5–13-0.0322%17 May
inferno13–5-0.0015%17 May
mirage13–90.0819%17 May
anubis13–60.0625%17 May
anubis13–30.0527%16 May
nuke5–13-0.15100%16 May
nuke9–130.0224%16 May
nuke13–80.0321%16 May
inferno11–130.0141%16 May
inferno7–13-0.0328%15 May
nuke8–130.0427%15 May
anubis6–13-0.0320%15 May
ancient8–13-0.0913%14 May
inferno7–13-0.1011%14 May
ancient13–100.0320%14 May
ancient13–10-0.0515%14 May
dust213–60.0440%14 May
nuke10–130.0324%14 May
inferno13–8-0.0420%14 May
overpass16–14-0.0014%14 May
dust216–130.0028%13 May
ancient10–130.0333%12 May
anubis16–13-0.0614%12 May
dust213–110.0317%12 May
inferno13–9-0.0025%12 May
inferno13–11-0.046%12 May
dust215–15-0.0219%10 May
dust213–70.0135%10 May
mirage14–16-0.0313%27 Apr
dust213–9-0.0119%27 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0110%27 Apr
dust25–13-0.0424%26 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0519%26 Apr
anubis11–130.0617%25 Apr
dust29–13-0.0220%25 Apr
overpass9–13-0.049%24 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0332%24 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0825%24 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0113%23 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0626%23 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0824%22 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0620%22 Apr
inferno13–100.0218%22 Apr
dust29–130.0019%22 Apr
ancient13–70.0530%22 Apr
inferno15–150.0116%19 Apr
dust28–13-0.0212%18 Apr
anubis13–60.0321%18 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0622%18 Apr
overpass11–130.0127%18 Apr
inferno15–150.0215%17 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0013%17 Apr
anubis16–130.0329%17 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0118%17 Apr
dust213–90.0832%17 Apr
anubis10–130.0217%17 Apr
dust213–70.1120%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →