we are thej — CS2 Stats

76561198021039397[U:1:60773669]✓ No bans

2,012Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.8 Developing

Premier CS Rating21,969Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,424 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48

Positioning49

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–38–3Last 10059%Win rateLWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8

Aggression5.9

Utility4.3

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8

Positioning4.9

Utility4.3

Mechanics5.1

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time577ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms

Headshot accuracy15.0%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–2Biggest win — cache

10Longest win streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	23	13–10	57%	-0.00
ancient	S	22	16–6	73%	0.01
inferno	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
nuke	B	13	6–7	46%	0.01
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
mirage	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
cache	S	9	8–1	89%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

285Matches

54%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

86.8ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	8	62%	1.15	17.5
Mirage	7	43%	1.21	17.3
Ancient	7	57%	1.35	17.7
Dust2	6	83%	1.42	14.8
Nuke	3	33%	1.13	18.7
Anubis	2	50%	0.94	16.0
Overpass	2	0%	0.55	8.5
Vertigo	1	100%	0.43	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy

29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.2%Spray accuracy

73.1%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

575msReaction time

41.6%T opening success

36.2%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

1.6%Flash assists

10.41HE damage / grenade

5.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4279 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 36.1963% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	11–13	-0.01	12%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	9%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	19%	25 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	15%	24 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.00	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.05	19%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	14%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	20%	14 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.09	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	6%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.09	19%	13 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	7%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	30%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	25%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	27%	11 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	5%	9 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.07	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	20%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	11%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	2–11	-0.02	5%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	15%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.01	11%	7 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	13%	7 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	13%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	16%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	18%	6 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.01	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	16%	2 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	15%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	10%	1 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.04	14%	1 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	11%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	22%	31 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.00	12%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	9%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	20%	31 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	16%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.08	17%	30 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	14%	30 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.07	6%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.08	24%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.06	25%	29 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.08	13%	29 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.01	22%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	14%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.00	17%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	12%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.06	25%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	9%	28 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	20%	28 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	12%	27 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	12%	27 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.04	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	8%	24 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.09	16%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	12%	24 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.02	17%	23 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	18%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.09	31%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	5%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.11	13%	23 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.00	17%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.12	11%	23 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	17%	22 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.00	14%	22 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.03	12%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	17%	21 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	5%	20 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	11%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	14%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	16%	20 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.00	20%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	11%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	6%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	19%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	14%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	25%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	15%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	11%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	1–8	-0.03	19%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	19%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.02	16%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.06	17%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	16%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.03	24%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	22%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.05	16%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	12%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.02	26%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	12%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	9%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	13%	16 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	13%	15 Jul →