flave

flave — CS2 Stats

DE76561198019570006[U:1:59304278]Steam profile ↗

556Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,433Purple band · top ~14.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18483 of 38602 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,281 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGflaveFACEITLevel 7 · 1,281 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,433 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning46
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53434Last 10053%Win rateWWLWTWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression4.3
Utility2.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.6
Utility2.2
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time592ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12mirageWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A30191163%-0.00
overpassB168850%-0.02
mirageD1441029%-0.05
cacheS129375%-0.03
infernoD103730%-0.00
nukeA95456%0.01
ancientA53260%0.00
anubis21150%-0.01
italy110100%-0.02
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

743Matches
50%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
73.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno850%0.9314.8
Anubis667%0.9511.7
Vertigo367%0.9412.0
Overpass333%1.0417.0
Dust230%0.6510.3
Mirage20%0.9018.5
Ancient10%0.8814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
597msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
4.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3915 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.8315% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–30.0117%28 Aug
cache13–80.0110%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0219%4 Jun
cache13–10-0.0716%4 Jun
cache12–120.0219%3 Jun
italy13–8-0.0218%3 Jun
cache13–8-0.0416%8 May
cache13–6-0.0120%8 May
cache13–8-0.0519%3 May
cache13–9-0.0637%2 May
cache13–5-0.0536%2 May
cache13–5-0.0339%2 May
cache7–13-0.0211%1 May
ancient13–70.0316%17 Sept
dust22–13-0.0118%16 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0229%15 Sept
dust211–130.0019%15 Sept
ancient13–70.0516%15 Sept
nuke11–13-0.027%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0310%13 Sept
dust211–13-0.0521%12 Sept
dust213–6-0.0124%12 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0817%11 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0520%11 Sept
dust213–6-0.0510%10 Sept
dust213–30.0516%9 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0612%6 Sept
mirage13–80.0211%6 Sept
overpass13–10-0.0624%6 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0225%6 Sept
nuke4–00.0233%6 Sept
dust213–8-0.0210%3 Sept
overpass4–13-0.0412%3 Sept
dust27–13-0.0015%2 Sept
nuke16–120.0118%2 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0319%1 Sept
overpass13–9-0.039%1 Sept
dust213–40.0319%30 Aug
dust213–40.0335%30 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0710%30 Aug
overpass16–13-0.049%29 Aug
dust210–130.0426%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0310%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0412%28 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0317%24 Aug
dust20–13-0.1638%24 Aug
overpass7–13-0.1025%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0421%15 Aug
overpass7–13-0.083%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0616%15 Aug
dust213–9-0.0423%11 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0417%11 Aug
inferno8–130.0118%10 Aug
dust213–7-0.0426%10 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0219%10 Aug
nuke13–60.0630%10 Aug
dust213–80.0228%9 Aug
nuke13–90.0219%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0229%9 Aug
dust213–60.0922%9 Aug
inferno13–00.1433%9 Aug
dust213–30.0228%6 Aug
dust22–130.0720%6 Aug
overpass0–6-0.0267%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0515%6 Aug
dust213–80.0518%6 Aug
overpass8–130.0115%6 Aug
overpass13–50.0813%3 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0124%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0229%2 Aug
dust27–130.000%2 Aug
overpass13–60.0531%31 Jul
overpass13–80.0223%30 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0513%26 Jul
dust213–100.0326%26 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0513%22 Jul
dust213–30.0439%22 Jul
nuke7–130.0220%22 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0515%21 Jul
inferno13–110.0518%20 Jul
overpass16–120.0327%20 Jul
mirage7–13-0.089%19 Jul
dust23–13-0.0927%19 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0824%17 Jul
mirage13–60.0124%17 Jul
ancient10–13-0.014%17 Jul
dust210–130.0228%13 Jul
dust213–11-0.0227%12 Jul
train6–13-0.0217%7 Jul
dust213–11-0.0032%7 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0623%7 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0131%6 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0116%5 Jul
dust213–60.0116%4 Jul
anubis15–15-0.028%29 Jun
mirage2–13-0.1419%29 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0324%29 Jun
dust213–70.0517%19 Jun
nuke13–90.0612%17 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0311%16 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →