akali

akali — CS2 Stats

76561198017869441[U:1:57603713]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,162Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning71
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53398Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression9.3
Utility4.2
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact7.4

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time514ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB24111346%0.01
ancientA1911858%0.03
mirageS1812667%0.05
dust2B136746%0.04
anubisD103730%0.01
nukeB63350%0.02
overpassS54180%0.02
cache32167%0.01
train1010%0.01
vertigo110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

383Matches
57%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
85.1ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9054%1.1916.6
Anubis7445%1.2818.2
Mirage7165%1.2417.5
Inferno5555%1.2217.2
Vertigo2857%1.2118.7
Overpass2374%1.4518.7
Dust21080%1.1316.4
Nuke967%1.4921.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
519msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
65.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.94HE damage / grenade
6.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4598 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6516% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.0423%21 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0218%19 Aug
cache13–110.0137%14 Aug
ancient13–90.0515%12 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0123%7 Aug
ancient16–120.0724%29 Jul
ancient13–70.0818%24 Jul
inferno9–130.0321%19 Jul
ancient13–50.0719%18 Jul
anubis15–150.0218%18 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0827%17 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0714%15 Jul
dust213–60.0522%5 Jul
overpass11–130.0420%28 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0124%28 Jun
cache11–130.0413%28 Jun
nuke13–60.0723%27 Jun
ancient10–130.0125%22 May
ancient6–130.0125%20 May
anubis9–13-0.0326%15 May
overpass13–110.0110%8 May
cache13–9-0.0030%8 May
ancient13–40.0729%1 May
anubis11–130.0116%1 May
anubis13–50.0415%29 Apr
dust212–120.1230%25 Apr
mirage5–130.0919%25 Apr
inferno16–140.0218%24 Apr
mirage13–50.0725%17 Apr
dust216–130.0417%17 Apr
anubis13–70.0723%17 Apr
inferno4–130.0224%17 Apr
dust27–130.0427%17 Apr
dust213–100.0015%14 Apr
inferno13–20.0525%10 Apr
ancient9–130.0126%10 Apr
overpass16–140.0118%8 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0127%3 Apr
dust213–30.0222%3 Apr
mirage13–70.0928%3 Apr
ancient13–70.0425%3 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0618%3 Apr
mirage13–110.0420%29 Mar
train12–120.0128%27 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0220%21 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0817%20 Feb
ancient16–130.0719%16 Feb
ancient13–40.1226%16 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0122%16 Feb
inferno13–50.0712%15 Feb
mirage13–100.0726%14 Feb
ancient13–70.0622%4 Feb
inferno10–130.0413%3 Feb
mirage13–30.1724%2 Feb
dust213–100.0630%1 Feb
mirage10–130.0627%1 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0321%30 Jan
inferno4–130.0127%24 Jan
mirage16–13-0.0029%24 Jan
inferno13–80.0331%24 Jan
inferno11–130.0025%23 Jan
anubis13–80.0821%23 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0525%23 Jan
mirage13–30.0727%23 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0312%23 Jan
nuke3–130.0533%23 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0423%21 Jan
dust29–13-0.0116%8 Dec
nuke2–130.0035%7 Dec
mirage12–120.0830%7 Dec
vertigo13–60.1023%24 Nov
mirage13–90.0323%24 Nov
inferno13–70.0423%21 Nov
inferno8–13-0.0234%19 Nov
overpass13–90.0631%18 Nov
dust24–130.0725%16 Nov
nuke13–90.0717%16 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0621%14 Nov
inferno13–90.0223%12 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0416%11 Nov
mirage13–70.0425%10 Nov
dust212–120.0429%10 Nov
nuke13–9-0.0218%9 Nov
inferno13–30.0735%7 Nov
mirage13–60.0740%6 Nov
dust213–80.0427%6 Nov
mirage13–40.0624%6 Nov
inferno8–80.1431%4 Nov
ancient12–120.0519%4 Nov
ancient7–13-0.128%31 Oct
inferno13–90.1519%30 Oct
inferno13–2-0.0617%29 Oct
mirage8–130.0011%27 Oct
mirage6–130.0526%27 Oct
mirage4–130.0242%27 Oct
overpass13–50.0116%24 Oct
ancient5–13-0.0416%22 Oct
dust29–13-0.024%21 Oct
inferno1–13-0.0119%21 Oct
dust212–120.0928%20 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →