FaceT<3

FaceT<3 — CS2 Stats

SE76561198017494072[U:1:57228344]Steam profile ↗

1,979Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,380Pink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3477 of 8024 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFaceT<3FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,380 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning43
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41581Last 10041%Win rateLLLLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.4
Utility4.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time617ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 13–3
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L6Current streak
1012In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 53% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1771041%-0.02
ancientB168850%0.00
anubisD1531220%-0.02
infernoB158753%0.02
cacheC146843%0.01
nukeC104640%-0.01
mirageC73443%-0.01
overpass42250%0.01
vertigo1010%0.13
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

258Matches
55%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3554%0.9213.9
Inferno2962%1.0414.4
Dust22658%0.9115.0
Ancient2152%0.8613.3
Cache1656%0.8913.1
Mirage1354%0.7612.5
Nuke1060%0.9415.3
Overpass683%1.0014.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
596msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.23HE damage / grenade
4.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4839 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.3629% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0317%24 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0816%20 Aug
cache11–13-0.050%18 Aug
anubis0–13-0.076%16 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0619%16 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0618%15 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0018%15 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0412%14 Aug
cache13–10.1023%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0623%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.0037%14 Aug
cache13–90.0129%13 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0926%13 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0316%13 Aug
nuke6–130.0119%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0623%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0518%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0611%8 Aug
overpass11–130.0227%8 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0219%7 Aug
overpass13–60.0011%7 Aug
cache11–130.0618%7 Aug
mirage13–100.0621%7 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0622%7 Aug
dust213–9-0.0319%7 Aug
inferno8–00.1522%7 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0326%5 Aug
nuke9–130.0025%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0227%3 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0014%31 Jul
dust25–130.0038%30 Jul
inferno9–130.0313%30 Jul
nuke9–130.0214%30 Jul
ancient8–130.0115%30 Jul
cache13–110.0522%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0621%30 Jul
ancient13–60.0919%30 Jul
vertigo12–120.1327%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0218%27 Jul
ancient14–160.0214%27 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0320%27 Jul
cache6–130.0518%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0216%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0217%26 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0812%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0218%26 Jul
overpass3–10-0.0232%26 Jul
dust22–13-0.1336%26 Jul
inferno14–160.0321%23 Jul
ancient13–50.0118%23 Jul
inferno16–130.0021%22 Jul
cache11–13-0.0216%22 Jul
nuke16–130.0918%22 Jul
inferno13–110.0317%22 Jul
anubis13–30.1813%22 Jul
dust213–60.1017%21 Jul
inferno13–160.0722%21 Jul
cache14–16-0.0117%21 Jul
dust23–13-0.0042%21 Jul
dust213–6-0.0235%14 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0421%14 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0110%14 Jul
cache13–50.0426%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0515%13 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0516%12 Jul
cache13–90.0312%12 Jul
dust213–7-0.016%11 Jul
anubis13–30.1625%11 Jul
overpass13–100.0313%11 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0413%11 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0220%10 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0221%10 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0713%10 Jul
inferno13–110.0014%10 Jul
dust25–13-0.1110%9 Jul
mirage13–50.1047%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0123%9 Jul
inferno13–60.0815%9 Jul
cache4–13-0.0529%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0313%9 Jul
ancient6–130.0015%9 Jul
ancient13–80.0226%8 Jul
train6–130.0129%7 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0324%7 Jul
cache13–50.0214%7 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0316%1 Jul
dust213–40.0328%1 Jul
inferno13–80.0022%1 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0324%1 Jul
inferno19–170.0720%30 Jun
ancient13–70.0618%28 Jun
dust213–11-0.0123%27 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0213%27 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0623%26 Jun
cache6–13-0.0417%25 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0824%25 Jun
ancient13–90.0028%25 Jun
anubis10–130.0023%25 Jun
nuke6–130.0319%25 Jun
dust27–13-0.0028%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →