chminimin — CS2 Stats

US76561198017487019[U:1:57221291]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

982Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,154Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9235 of 26229 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,615 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning54

Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateWWWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression7.2

Utility6.3

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.4

Utility6.3

Mechanics9.0

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time572ms−30ms

first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms

Headshot accuracy26.2%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–2

13–2Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

W3Current streak

13–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 19infernoWeakest map · 10% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	24	10–14	42%	0.01
mirage	S	19	13–6	68%	-0.00
dust2	B	17	9–8	53%	0.01
cache	A	12	7–5	58%	0.01
inferno	D	10	1–9	10%	0.02
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

581Matches

51%Win rate

1.32Avg K/D

96.7ADR

59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	149	53%	1.35	18.9
Nuke	93	52%	1.48	20.4
Ancient	54	46%	1.33	20.4
Overpass	39	54%	1.64	21.5
Dust2	29	41%	1.28	18.2
Inferno	26	38%	1.23	17.2
Train	13	54%	1.31	20.0
Anubis	13	54%	1.19	16.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.1%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.1%Spray accuracy

90.4%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

563msReaction time

34.3%T opening success

45.8%CT opening success

0.79Enemies flashed / flash

7.3%Flash assists

11.45HE damage / grenade

13.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.2898% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–5	0.02	25%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.09	29%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.00	27%	26 Aug →
cache	22–20	-0.02	30%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	23%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	20%	17 Aug →
vertigo	13–16	0.02	28%	17 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	15%	14 Aug →
cache	25–23	-0.03	23%	8 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	31%	8 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	33%	8 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.04	19%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	21%	1 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.06	30%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.04	42%	1 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	24%	30 Jul →
cache	12–16	0.02	32%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	30%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	28%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.07	42%	27 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	26%	27 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	33%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.04	47%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	28%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	23%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	20%	22 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.04	29%	19 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	14%	19 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.02	23%	16 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	26%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	21%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	28%	11 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	47%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.11	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	15%	3 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	16%	28 Jun →
inferno	9–13	0.01	48%	27 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.04	27%	26 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.01	13%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	14%	26 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.02	32%	26 Jun →
anubis	15–15	0.01	30%	25 Jun →
cache	16–14	0.01	23%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	24%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.06	28%	24 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	15%	22 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	22%	21 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	18%	21 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.06	26%	16 Jun →
nuke	15–15	0.02	28%	14 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	19%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.03	30%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.06	28%	24 May →
inferno	14–16	0.02	22%	23 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	32%	23 May →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	32%	14 May →
cache	13–6	0.13	29%	1 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	17%	1 May →
cache	13–11	0.06	24%	1 May →
nuke	13–8	0.14	30%	30 Apr →
cache	9–13	-0.01	19%	29 Apr →
cache	11–13	-0.04	22%	28 Apr →
overpass	10–13	-0.03	25%	26 Apr →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	23%	26 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	18%	26 Apr →
dust2	13–2	0.02	23%	26 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.07	23%	26 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.06	30%	25 Apr →
nuke	13–2	0.15	25%	25 Apr →
overpass	9–13	-0.03	22%	25 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.02	28%	25 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	26%	25 Apr →
dust2	6–13	0.04	29%	24 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.15	34%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	20%	21 Apr →
ancient	12–16	0.01	16%	20 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	18%	20 Apr →
overpass	13–5	-0.00	22%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.03	22%	10 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.07	19%	10 Apr →
ancient	14–16	0.01	35%	22 Mar →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	25%	22 Mar →
overpass	16–13	0.02	28%	15 Feb →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	29%	15 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	31%	15 Feb →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	19%	13 Feb →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	24%	10 Jan →
nuke	13–4	0.03	28%	16 Dec →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	29%	13 Dec →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	24%	10 Dec →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	28%	10 Dec →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	36%	6 Dec →
nuke	5–4	-0.01	17%	6 Dec →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	16%	6 Dec →
nuke	13–6	0.14	31%	3 Dec →