Celtic — CS2 Stats

76561198012293105[U:1:52027377]✓ No bans

1,340Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,806Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning57

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression5.7

Utility6.8

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning5.7

Utility6.8

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time613ms−34ms

first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–1Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 25dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	33	18–15	55%	0.02
inferno	A	25	14–11	56%	0.02
cache	C	18	7–11	39%	0.01
nuke	B	15	7–8	47%	0.01
dust2	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.01
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

312Matches

55%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

73.4ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	25	36%	0.89	14.7
Ancient	14	29%	0.72	10.7
Inferno	11	64%	0.98	14.0
Dust2	7	71%	0.83	11.4
Anubis	4	25%	0.74	12.3
Nuke	3	33%	0.84	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

10.9°Preaim

604msReaction time

29.4%T opening success

48.3%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

6.7%Flash assists

9.36HE damage / grenade

15.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.4418% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	5–13	-0.03	16%	26 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	21%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	18%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.08	18%	24 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	24%	24 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	10%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	19%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.07	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	17%	14 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	10%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	27%	13 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.05	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.05	21%	13 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.02	16%	13 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	19%	12 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.10	20%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.07	24%	12 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	27%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.02	23%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	21%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.06	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.00	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.05	19%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	12%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.03	17%	3 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.01	25%	3 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	23%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	29%	1 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.01	28%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.05	22%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	36%	30 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	12%	30 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.01	18%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.07	13%	29 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	17%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	13%	26 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	17%	26 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.04	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	0–6	-0.00	21%	26 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.01	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	16–13	-0.03	19%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	28%	25 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.10	11%	25 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.10	22%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	16%	25 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	19%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	13%	24 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	19%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.03	19%	24 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	14%	23 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.05	21%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	14%	23 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.03	12%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	24%	21 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	18%	20 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	19%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	23%	19 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.01	20%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	12%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.10	18%	18 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.02	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	12%	16 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.02	17%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.04	24%	16 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.06	21%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.08	26%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.13	24%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.15	15%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	23%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	20%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	24%	12 Jul →
cache	0–13	-0.10	5%	11 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.07	19%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	27%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.06	21%	11 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.09	26%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	24%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.04	16%	10 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	3%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.00	19%	10 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	15%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	18%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	18%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	19%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.00	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.05	26%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	15%	9 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	27%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	18%	9 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	21%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	25%	9 Jul →