tobito--- — CS2 Stats

76561198008799464[U:1:48533736]

1,027Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.1 Developing

Premier CS Rating25,237Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49

Positioning33

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateLTWWWWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9

Aggression2.6

Utility3.8

Positioning3.3

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9

Positioning3.3

Utility3.8

Mechanics3.4

Opening Duels0.4

Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time566ms−114ms

first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms

Headshot accuracy21.8%+1.5%

first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–1Biggest win — cache

9Longest win streak

5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15dust2Weakest map · 27% over 22

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	22	6–16	27%	-0.05
ancient	S	15	11–4	73%	-0.02
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.02
mirage	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.03
anubis	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.02
cache	S	12	8–4	67%	-0.01
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.04
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

75Matches

56%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

73.1ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	8	62%	0.86	14.4
Inferno	7	86%	1.06	14.4
Anubis	3	100%	0.75	15.7
Nuke	2	50%	0.52	10.0
Ancient	2	50%	0.92	14.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.04	25.0
Vertigo	1	100%	0.96	24.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy

29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.8%Spray accuracy

65.3%Counter-strafing

11.0°Preaim

595msReaction time

19.7%T opening success

33.0%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

2.1%Flash assists

7.58HE damage / grenade

5.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4996 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.6955% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	11–13	-0.09	24%	29 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	20%	22 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.02	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.08	21%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.01	24%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.00	34%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	38%	21 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.07	11%	21 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.12	20%	21 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.11	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.12	0%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	32%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.01	27%	15 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	17%	14 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.03	22%	14 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	14%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	21%	14 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.01	44%	8 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	18%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	17%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	17%	4 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.04	13%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.04	19%	4 Aug →
mirage	2–13	0.00	27%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	29%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	29%	3 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	26%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.02	21%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	21%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	27%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	23%	2 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	23%	2 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	41%	2 Aug →
cache	13–1	-0.00	35%	2 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.07	32%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	44%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.08	26%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	17%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	24%	30 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	21%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	13%	30 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	34%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.10	21%	27 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	16%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.00	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	5%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	21%	25 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.10	50%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	14%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	40%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.03	19%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	30%	21 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.01	23%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	19%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.03	25%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	25%	28 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	16%	28 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	21%	21 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.03	20%	21 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	24%	21 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	7%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.08	28%	20 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.11	12%	20 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.07	13%	18 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	24%	18 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	9%	18 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	22%	18 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	11%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.05	11%	12 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	21%	12 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	22%	7 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.10	4%	7 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	24%	7 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.11	15%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.07	35%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	27%	30 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	30%	30 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	16%	30 May →
ancient	16–14	0.01	19%	30 May →
ancient	13–3	0.02	17%	30 May →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	45%	29 May →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	24%	29 May →
inferno	13–3	-0.00	33%	29 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	12%	29 May →
anubis	13–1	0.00	22%	29 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	16%	29 May →
overpass	4–13	-0.04	24%	24 May →
inferno	16–12	-0.04	24%	24 May →
anubis	13–4	0.07	21%	23 May →