mikail

mikail — CS2 Stats

76561198006110748[U:1:45845020]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,776Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,361Purple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10249 of 21874 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,066 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmikailFACEITLevel 8 · 1,066 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,361 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning46
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54433Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression6.4
Utility4.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.6
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time518ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–8
132Biggest win — cache
11Longest win streak
L3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28131546%0.00
infernoA1610663%0.03
cacheS1410471%0.03
nukeA138562%0.01
dust2D113827%-0.00
ancientC104640%0.03
anubisS75271%0.03
debris110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

814Matches
49%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26347%0.9914.8
Inferno19649%1.0215.4
Nuke11446%1.0216.1
Dust27952%1.0315.6
Ancient4850%1.1415.4
Anubis4637%0.9813.8
Overpass3569%1.1017.6
Train1747%1.0015.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
522msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.83HE damage / grenade
5.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–160.0311%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0414%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.0340%28 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0515%28 Aug
nuke13–90.0515%28 Aug
ancient16–120.1025%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0130%28 Aug
cache3–130.0925%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0324%27 Aug
inferno6–130.0024%27 Aug
mirage7–13-0.107%27 Aug
inferno13–40.0615%27 Aug
anubis11–130.0417%26 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0515%26 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0630%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0022%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0220%25 Aug
cache13–20.0524%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0233%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0221%25 Aug
mirage13–110.0521%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1022%25 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0116%25 Aug
ancient10–130.0718%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0215%24 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0319%23 Aug
nuke13–100.0423%23 Aug
dust213–70.0322%23 Aug
mirage16–120.0715%23 Aug
inferno10–130.0416%23 Aug
cache13–30.1516%23 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0120%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0137%22 Aug
dust215–150.0619%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0515%22 Aug
inferno13–70.0024%22 Aug
cache13–10-0.0210%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0214%22 Aug
nuke10–130.0823%22 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0419%22 Aug
inferno14–160.0018%22 Aug
anubis16–140.0722%22 Aug
dust20–8-0.1410%21 Aug
mirage4–130.0116%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0531%21 Aug
cache13–80.1722%21 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0014%20 Aug
anubis13–90.0627%20 Aug
nuke13–100.0821%20 Aug
cache13–4-0.0212%20 Aug
debris9–60.0913%20 Aug
inferno13–20.1430%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0313%19 Aug
nuke13–40.019%19 Aug
anubis13–100.0817%19 Aug
inferno5–20.0535%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0221%19 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0414%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0322%18 Aug
inferno13–40.0814%18 Aug
mirage13–70.0319%18 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0212%17 Aug
dust211–130.1117%17 Aug
inferno13–50.0211%17 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0728%17 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0217%17 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0421%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0416%16 Aug
inferno9–130.0622%16 Aug
ancient7–130.0222%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0216%16 Aug
mirage15–150.0226%15 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0121%15 Aug
mirage13–110.0517%15 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1213%15 Aug
cache13–80.0120%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0716%14 Aug
nuke13–70.0415%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0619%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0035%12 Aug
cache9–13-0.018%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.0112%12 Aug
mirage13–110.0210%12 Aug
mirage6–130.0213%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0424%12 Aug
cache13–40.0913%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.0120%12 Aug
cache13–160.0419%11 Aug
mirage14–160.0415%11 Aug
mirage13–30.1625%11 Aug
mirage14–160.0116%8 Aug
ancient7–130.0425%8 Aug
inferno13–40.1144%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0236%8 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0019%8 Aug
dust213–70.0537%8 Aug
ancient13–100.0522%8 Aug
dust213–70.0227%7 Aug
ancient13–90.0019%7 Aug
anubis13–50.0311%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →