crowley — CS2 Stats

76561198004602734[U:1:44337006]

836Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,207Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#932 of 22699 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,916 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcrowleyFACEITLevel 9 · 1,916 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,207 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning56
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60391Last 10060%Win rateWWLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3
Aggression7.1
Utility3.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.6
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time579ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–7
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 54% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.01
dust2A22121055%0.02
infernoA2113862%0.02
ancientA159660%0.02
cacheS107370%0.05
nukeS65183%0.01
anubis21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (54% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

310Matches
56%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
78.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4854%1.1518.1
Ancient4257%1.1617.3
Nuke3364%1.3617.7
Inferno2662%1.4417.1
Vertigo2070%1.2518.1
Anubis1861%1.3017.2
Dust21540%1.0914.7
Overpass743%1.1415.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.7%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
581msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
6.14HE damage / grenade
3.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4004 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.1475% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.1024%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0417%27 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0330%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0219%19 Aug
cache4–130.0720%19 Aug
dust23–130.0343%19 Aug
cache13–40.0934%15 Aug
mirage12–30.0311%6 Aug
ancient3–0-0.030%6 Aug
inferno8–3-0.0110%6 Aug
dust215–150.0038%6 Aug
dust213–0-0.0245%6 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0317%4 Aug
dust213–80.0414%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0026%3 Aug
inferno10–130.0423%30 Jul
mirage13–10.1223%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0418%30 Jul
cache13–100.0227%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0120%24 Jul
dust213–7-0.0124%19 Jul
inferno13–60.0321%19 Jul
dust213–40.0461%19 Jul
cache13–10.0445%19 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0026%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0323%19 Jul
cache13–40.0028%19 Jul
dust26–130.0132%18 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0222%18 Jul
inferno11–130.0533%18 Jul
ancient16–120.0628%18 Jul
nuke13–110.0131%18 Jul
mirage13–100.0218%18 Jul
ancient16–130.0022%17 Jul
dust216–140.0223%17 Jul
dust26–130.0221%17 Jul
mirage13–30.0630%17 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0517%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0730%16 Jul
inferno16–140.0026%15 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0112%15 Jul
ancient13–50.0327%15 Jul
cache5–13-0.0429%15 Jul
ancient13–80.1517%15 Jul
dust213–110.0634%15 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0034%15 Jul
cache9–13-0.0030%14 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0111%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0633%14 Jul
anubis13–20.0825%14 Jul
inferno13–40.0635%14 Jul
dust214–160.0631%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.0218%13 Jul
inferno10–130.0729%13 Jul
dust213–5-0.0226%12 Jul
inferno13–90.1216%12 Jul
dust24–130.0216%12 Jul
inferno13–110.0319%12 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0016%11 Jul
inferno10–130.0424%10 Jul
mirage13–80.0322%10 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0226%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0327%5 Jul
dust210–130.0222%5 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0324%5 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0414%2 Jul
ancient13–50.0914%26 Jun
nuke13–80.0333%26 Jun
dust213–30.1028%25 Jun
inferno16–140.0523%18 Jun
mirage13–80.0222%18 Jun
dust213–90.0315%18 Jun
inferno13–30.0123%12 Jun
nuke13–90.0825%11 Jun
inferno0–80.0150%11 Jun
dust210–13-0.0223%11 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0430%7 Jun
dust213–10.0918%7 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0419%4 Jun
mirage10–130.0224%1 Jun
inferno10–130.0212%1 Jun
mirage13–90.0128%31 May
dust213–40.0123%31 May
mirage7–13-0.0325%31 May
dust213–30.1212%31 May
nuke3–13-0.0729%31 May
inferno13–110.0830%31 May
mirage7–13-0.079%31 May
cache13–50.0624%28 May
cache13–70.1625%28 May
ancient8–13-0.0118%28 May
mirage1–13-0.0723%28 May
ancient13–50.0816%25 May
mirage13–110.0330%25 May
dust22–13-0.117%5 May
ancient11–130.0417%5 May
mirage8–130.0722%5 May
inferno7–13-0.0121%4 May
mirage13–90.0324%1 May
mirage8–13-0.0437%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →