Send Dudes — CS2 Stats

DE76561198004145304[U:1:43879576]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

370Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,338Purple band · top ~11.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20543 of 48112 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,446 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning60

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–45–7Last 10048%Win rateLWLLTLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression10.0

Utility5.9

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels5.3

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning6.0

Utility5.9

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels5.3

Win Impact3.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time606ms−120ms

first ⅓ avg 727ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy27.0%+3.8%

first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 6–13

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	53	27–26	51%	0.03
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	0.05
cache	S	14	10–4	71%	0.04
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	0.00
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
inferno	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.01
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

228Matches

53%Win rate

1.45Avg K/D

103.0ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

75%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	33%	1.53	22.3
Ancient	2	100%	1.64	21.0
Inferno	1	0%	1.29	18.0
Nuke	1	100%	0.94	16.0
Overpass	1	100%	1.31	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy

35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

82.7%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

607msReaction time

43.5%T opening success

58.7%CT opening success

0.68Enemies flashed / flash

13.1%Flash assists

15.09HE damage / grenade

3.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.3885 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.03	14%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	21%	29 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.02	10%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	30%	28 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.03	20%	28 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.08	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	9%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	35%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	37%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	46%	27 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	11%	27 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.08	13%	27 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	75%	27 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	26%	26 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.05	30%	26 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.10	18%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	20%	25 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	24%	24 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	24%	24 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.01	23%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.11	15%	23 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.08	21%	23 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	32%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	25%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.14	35%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	33%	20 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.03	29%	20 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	45%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	59%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.08	40%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	40%	19 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	28%	18 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.06	30%	18 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.05	29%	18 Aug →
mirage	2–3	-0.07	43%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	50%	18 Aug →
mirage	2–5	-0.03	60%	18 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	26%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	24%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.12	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.06	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.06	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.19	23%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	43%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	44%	14 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	20%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	17%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.14	20%	11 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	21%	10 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	26%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.05	29%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	50%	8 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	16%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	28%	8 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.06	29%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.09	26%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	16%	6 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	19%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	25%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	14%	2 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.13	24%	1 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	21%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.10	21%	1 Aug →
cache	13–1	-0.03	20%	31 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	20%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.00	26%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	25%	31 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.00	18%	30 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	24%	29 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.02	21%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	18%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	19%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.19	28%	28 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.01	31%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	24%	27 Jul →
nuke	10–1	-0.00	3%	26 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.03	43%	26 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	26%	22 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	22%	21 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.08	44%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	26%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.13	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	39%	20 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.06	30%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	14%	19 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	12%	19 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.01	25%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.07	24%	16 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	33%	13 Jul →