reveal' — CS2 Stats

76561197999081945[U:1:38816217]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,230Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 Developing

Premier CS Rating7,449Light Blue band · top ~67.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#41612 of 55681 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50

Positioning50

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–44–12Last 10044%Win rateLLLTWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0

Aggression6.8

Utility6.4

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch7.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0

Positioning5.0

Utility6.4

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time636ms−72ms

first ⅓ avg 707ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms

Headshot accuracy15.0%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–2Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 32% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	34	13–21	38%	-0.00
mirage	A	20	12–8	60%	0.02
nuke	D	19	6–13	32%	-0.00
inferno	C	17	7–10	41%	0.02
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

842Matches

48%Win rate

0.95Avg K/D

59.7ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

57%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	13	54%	0.92	14.9
Nuke	11	73%	0.77	12.0
Inferno	11	9%	0.79	12.9
Ancient	10	40%	0.86	13.6
Anubis	8	62%	0.98	10.1
Vertigo	7	57%	0.62	10.9
Dust2	5	20%	0.68	10.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.94	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.2%Spray accuracy

76.6%Counter-strafing

10.9°Preaim

635msReaction time

27.7%T opening success

49.2%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

9.5%Flash assists

8.45HE damage / grenade

13.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6245% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.6864% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	5–13	-0.01	13%	30 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.09	13%	30 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	19%	30 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.01	18%	30 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.00	12%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	16%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	12%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	14%	29 Aug →
nuke	6–1	0.01	13%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	18%	29 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	14%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	8%	28 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.08	9%	28 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.03	12%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	15%	28 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.01	22%	28 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.01	18%	27 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	8%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.08	19%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.09	18%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	10%	25 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	26%	24 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.01	8%	24 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.03	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.08	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.08	20%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	13%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	13%	22 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	0–8	-0.05	27%	22 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.06	19%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	38%	21 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.09	14%	21 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	9%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	24%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.08	19%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	26%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	12%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	16%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	8%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.09	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	8%	16 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.13	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.10	15%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.06	30%	14 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.00	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	9%	14 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.08	18%	14 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	12%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.08	16%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.11	14%	10 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.01	13%	10 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.04	5%	8 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.04	24%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	10%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	10%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.07	13%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	13%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	12%	8 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.02	17%	8 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.01	20%	8 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.02	17%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	17%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.08	17%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	8%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.06	13%	8 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.00	21%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.07	10%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.05	18%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	19%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.02	12%	7 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	20%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	22%	6 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	16%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	17%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.12	13%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.15	13%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	35%	3 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	16%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	32%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.13	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	22%	3 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.02	16%	1 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.10	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.07	11%	1 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	18%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.08	19%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	10%	1 Aug →