Zinedine zedog #4 — CS2 Stats

76561197995448021[U:1:35182293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,792Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,740Purple band · top ~9.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17869 of 43200 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning47

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression3.9

Utility5.1

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning4.7

Utility5.1

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time605ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms

Headshot accuracy21.8%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–2Biggest win — cache

9Longest win streak

5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 19nukeWeakest map · 28% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	23	13–10	57%	-0.01
cache	A	19	12–7	63%	0.01
dust2	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.02
nuke	D	18	5–13	28%	-0.03
inferno	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
anubis	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

895Matches

52%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

80.8ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win

34%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	11	55%	1.37	18.4
Mirage	9	67%	0.89	13.9
Anubis	7	43%	1.10	19.9
Nuke	5	80%	1.45	16.8
Inferno	2	100%	2.40	19.0
Ancient	2	0%	1.18	19.5
Cache	2	100%	0.76	12.5
Train	1	100%	0.85	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

73.8%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

580msReaction time

21.3%T opening success

46.2%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

11.39HE damage / grenade

5.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4854 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.2858% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–1	-0.01	28%	26 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	23%	26 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.01	29%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	24%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.12	26%	21 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	25%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.06	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–0	-0.00	20%	21 Aug →
dust2	0–2	-0.10	0%	21 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.07	11%	21 Aug →
nuke	0–5	-0.07	50%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	17%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	13%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	21%	19 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.02	28%	15 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.07	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	11%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	33%	15 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.02	15%	15 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	29%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	27%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	23%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	18%	14 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	31%	12 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.04	14%	12 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.03	29%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	17%	10 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	32%	10 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	100%	10 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.01	42%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	14%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.00	42%	8 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	27%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	25%	8 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.02	18%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.10	39%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	21%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.00	38%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.10	15%	7 Aug →
overpass	13–5	-0.02	20%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	24%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	37%	5 Aug →
mirage	6–2	0.07	42%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	19%	4 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	29%	4 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	22%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–2	-0.09	33%	3 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	21%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.12	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	26%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.14	30%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.08	21%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.14	33%	29 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.09	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.00	24%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.02	23%	24 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	16%	24 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	35%	24 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	27%	24 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.07	67%	22 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.03	8%	22 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.07	23%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.09	14%	21 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.08	35%	21 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	15%	20 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.07	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	9%	8 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	41%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	9%	4 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.05	27%	4 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	12%	4 Jul →
nuke	0–2	-0.03	0%	3 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.11	10%	3 Jul →
mirage	0–5	-0.03	0%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.03	22%	26 Jun →
mirage	14–16	-0.08	33%	29 May →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	11%	22 May →
ancient	2–10	-0.04	23%	22 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.09	9%	22 May →
inferno	13–2	-0.04	31%	22 May →
anubis	13–8	0.06	22%	22 May →
cache	13–7	0.06	42%	15 May →
cache	13–2	0.00	19%	15 May →
cache	13–6	-0.05	29%	15 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	26%	14 May →
mirage	13–6	0.02	17%	14 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	14%	13 May →
vertigo	13–9	-0.01	33%	13 May →
nuke	13–5	0.01	26%	13 May →
cache	10–13	-0.08	41%	13 May →
cache	11–13	-0.03	14%	13 May →
inferno	10–13	0.02	20%	13 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	29%	12 May →