Jonkers — CS2 Stats

76561197995253736[U:1:34988008]

1,633Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,198Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5763 of 33525 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJonkersFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER24,198 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning52
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression6.6
Utility4.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch9.4

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time567ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–1
131Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
716In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 90% over 10mirageWeakest map · 23% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2662023%-0.00
nukeS1511473%0.02
cacheA138562%0.02
anubisC125742%0.01
infernoA127558%0.01
dust2A127558%0.01
ancientS109190%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches
85%Win rate
2.09Avg K/D
116.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo4100%1.8623.0
Ancient3100%2.1023.3
Nuke250%2.9521.0
Mirage1100%1.0019.0
Overpass1100%4.0032.0
Dust210%1.0716.0
Anubis1100%1.3822.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
571msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
11.09HE damage / grenade
3.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1438 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.3782% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0716%27 Aug
nuke13–7-0.057%27 Aug
anubis11–13-0.048%27 Aug
inferno13–90.0035%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.045%27 Aug
mirage6–130.0213%27 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0512%26 Aug
nuke13–110.0327%26 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1216%26 Aug
dust213–2-0.0119%26 Aug
mirage13–50.0326%25 Aug
cache13–30.0327%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0413%24 Aug
mirage13–60.1414%24 Aug
ancient13–7-0.047%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0716%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0918%24 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0420%24 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0615%23 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0314%23 Aug
anubis9–130.0316%23 Aug
inferno13–50.0017%23 Aug
cache5–130.0216%23 Aug
inferno11–130.0629%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0811%23 Aug
ancient11–40.0932%21 Aug
mirage13–110.0319%20 Aug
cache16–140.0215%19 Aug
nuke13–60.0612%19 Aug
dust213–110.0127%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0025%18 Aug
ancient13–20.1434%18 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0532%18 Aug
dust213–90.0835%18 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0617%18 Aug
cache4–13-0.0229%18 Aug
nuke13–70.0445%18 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0120%17 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0415%16 Aug
cache13–50.0615%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0218%16 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0615%16 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0311%14 Aug
nuke13–100.0922%14 Aug
anubis13–20.0411%14 Aug
anubis13–70.0219%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0218%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0519%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0211%13 Aug
dust213–90.0229%13 Aug
dust213–60.0625%12 Aug
mirage5–130.0012%12 Aug
ancient13–100.0519%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0716%11 Aug
anubis13–10.1613%10 Aug
ancient13–110.0812%10 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0316%10 Aug
mirage10–130.0215%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.0215%9 Aug
mirage13–50.109%7 Aug
nuke11–130.0918%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0115%7 Aug
inferno16–130.0518%7 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0216%7 Aug
anubis11–130.0113%7 Aug
nuke13–9-0.036%6 Aug
ancient13–30.0810%6 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0321%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0525%5 Aug
anubis13–30.0420%5 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0310%5 Aug
cache13–40.0418%5 Aug
nuke13–40.0421%5 Aug
cache13–50.0423%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0017%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0522%4 Aug
mirage11–130.0015%3 Aug
dust27–13-0.0016%3 Aug
nuke13–70.0615%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0215%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0512%28 Jul
anubis13–60.0610%28 Jul
cache6–130.0212%28 Jul
dust24–130.0116%28 Jul
dust213–90.0312%27 Jul
inferno16–130.0716%26 Jul
ancient13–30.1532%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0018%26 Jul
nuke11–130.0122%23 Jul
dust213–10-0.0219%23 Jul
inferno13–50.0016%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0227%22 Jul
cache9–13-0.0415%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0621%22 Jul
cache13–60.0318%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0610%22 Jul
mirage2–11-0.0314%20 Jul
dust211–13-0.0210%20 Jul
cache10–130.0130%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0134%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →