Tasty Neuralink Macaque — CS2 Stats

76561197994836769[U:1:34571041]

159Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTasty Neuralink MacaqueFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning41
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45532Last 10045%Win rateWLLWLLLLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.3
Aggression1.3
Utility4.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 4% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning4.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time599ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy10.7%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — inferno 16–3
163Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
144In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
82Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 16mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB33171652%-0.04
ancientA169756%-0.05
vertigoC156940%-0.03
overpassB115645%-0.06
dust2A116555%-0.05
mirageD71614%-0.05
nuke4040%-0.04
train2020%-0.03
anubis110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

191Matches
48%Win rate
0.67Avg K/D
58.9ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient633%0.9115.8
Inferno5100%1.1812.4
Mirage20%0.529.5
Overpass250%0.887.5
Vertigo10%0.213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.7%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
71.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
591msReaction time
4.2%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
6.90HE damage / grenade
9.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.7214% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.405 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 4.2007% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.076%12 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0317%12 Feb
train5–13-0.0314%6 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0114%5 Feb
train8–13-0.0211%5 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0713%31 Jan
dust29–13-0.1015%23 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0926%22 Mar
vertigo12–12-0.038%19 Mar
vertigo13–20.0419%18 Mar
mirage12–12-0.080%18 Mar
inferno13–5-0.013%26 Feb
anubis13–5-0.0022%26 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0815%21 Feb
inferno13–90.0212%22 Nov
inferno9–6-0.039%5 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0215%7 Aug
overpass4–16-0.076%3 Jul
inferno16–140.0210%3 Jul
inferno16–12-0.046%1 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0312%30 Jun
ancient16–40.044%30 Jun
dust216–110.0015%30 Jun
ancient12–16-0.025%30 Jun
dust216–14-0.006%27 Jun
vertigo10–16-0.0413%27 Jun
overpass16–14-0.069%27 Jun
mirage13–16-0.078%26 Jun
inferno14–16-0.089%26 Jun
inferno12–16-0.038%22 Jun
vertigo7–16-0.064%22 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0210%13 Apr
ancient19–17-0.049%13 Apr
vertigo5–9-0.017%7 Mar
nuke15–19-0.045%7 Mar
inferno19–16-0.0114%29 Jan
ancient16–14-0.038%29 Jan
vertigo15–18-0.044%28 Jan
inferno16–9-0.028%28 Jan
overpass8–16-0.0812%28 Jan
dust216–13-0.0610%28 Jan
overpass10–16-0.097%28 Jan
vertigo13–16-0.109%28 Jan
inferno16–12-0.056%28 Jan
inferno16–11-0.039%27 Jan
inferno19–15-0.0415%27 Jan
ancient14–16-0.0711%23 Jan
inferno9–16-0.0115%23 Jan
dust24–16-0.076%23 Jan
dust26–16-0.0717%2 Nov
inferno10–16-0.0921%2 Nov
overpass16–9-0.025%19 Oct
inferno13–16-0.060%19 Oct
inferno13–16-0.037%19 Oct
vertigo16–140.023%28 Sept
ancient16–10-0.062%28 Sept
inferno10–16-0.058%28 Sept
vertigo16–12-0.084%13 Sept
overpass16–9-0.028%13 Sept
mirage16–12-0.026%13 Sept
inferno13–16-0.076%29 Aug
inferno16–30.0812%23 Aug
inferno8–16-0.0611%15 Aug
dust216–14-0.068%15 Aug
vertigo9–4-0.0310%15 Aug
ancient7–16-0.133%15 Aug
mirage11–16-0.0411%15 Aug
inferno16–7-0.0524%14 Aug
ancient16–4-0.012%14 Aug
dust216–6-0.1110%14 Aug
inferno16–10-0.0315%14 Aug
dust29–16-0.0614%14 Aug
dust219–22-0.0416%14 Aug
inferno9–16-0.0113%6 Jul
overpass11–16-0.068%6 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0414%1 Jun
inferno5–16-0.0810%27 May
vertigo14–16-0.0511%27 May
nuke10–16-0.0210%27 May
vertigo16–14-0.0310%27 May
ancient16–14-0.065%23 May
overpass16–13-0.0516%23 May
ancient7–16-0.0819%23 May
inferno9–16-0.0719%23 May
ancient16–14-0.0518%16 May
vertigo21–25-0.0515%16 May
inferno16–19-0.089%3 Apr
mirage10–16-0.046%3 Apr
overpass9–16-0.0916%3 Apr
inferno12–16-0.057%3 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0911%29 Mar
vertigo16–4-0.016%29 Mar
overpass16–14-0.078%29 Mar
ancient16–4-0.019%29 Mar
mirage9–16-0.096%27 Mar
inferno16–7-0.0411%27 Mar
vertigo5–16-0.032%27 Mar
nuke5–16-0.077%27 Mar
inferno13–16-0.066%27 Mar
dust219–17-0.0115%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →