Sven Curly — CS2 Stats

76561197992973254[U:1:32707526]

586Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,899Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning43
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression4.1
Utility4.9
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time609ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30141647%0.00
overpassC167944%0.02
ancientC114736%-0.02
infernoC114736%-0.02
nukeA116555%0.02
anubisB84450%-0.00
cacheB63350%0.01
dust2A53260%0.02
train21150%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

83,504Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
4,811Matches
36.2%Match win rate
41.9%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
7,584MVPs
2,728Hours (in match)
4,326Bombs planted
878Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,521inferno
3,133dust2
2,367train
1,128cbble
831nuke
306vertigo
61italy
50office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

371Matches
49%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10%0.7311.0
Anubis1100%0.7311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
603msReaction time
19.8%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
12.22HE damage / grenade
4.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.7885% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0324%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0318%22 Jul
anubis13–20.0215%21 Jul
dust213–110.0811%26 Jun
dust213–3-0.0419%20 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0435%20 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0618%20 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0316%15 Jun
overpass11–130.0113%15 Jun
ancient8–13-0.049%14 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0729%9 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0220%9 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0526%8 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0316%8 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0341%6 Jun
overpass10–130.0528%5 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0118%5 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0112%4 Jun
dust27–130.0220%4 Jun
mirage16–120.0114%4 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0216%4 Jun
nuke16–130.0728%2 Jun
mirage16–130.0517%2 Jun
mirage13–00.0327%28 May
overpass10–13-0.0210%28 May
inferno2–13-0.0019%26 May
mirage13–80.0924%26 May
mirage11–13-0.0422%25 May
cache12–12-0.0315%25 May
mirage9–130.0425%23 May
dust26–13-0.0825%22 May
overpass13–40.0510%22 May
train9–130.0424%22 May
cache13–10.0033%22 May
mirage8–13-0.075%22 May
nuke13–50.0216%22 May
nuke14–16-0.0126%19 May
mirage9–130.0121%17 May
overpass6–130.0320%17 May
nuke7–130.0124%17 May
cache13–110.0825%12 May
inferno7–13-0.0941%5 May
anubis4–13-0.0615%5 May
overpass13–10-0.0122%29 Apr
cache10–130.0226%29 Apr
cache13–50.0117%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.0218%29 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0229%28 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0418%28 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0511%26 Apr
mirage13–70.0419%26 Apr
dust213–110.1026%26 Apr
anubis7–13-0.068%26 Apr
nuke13–30.0226%26 Apr
anubis13–30.0721%24 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0222%24 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0115%24 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0420%24 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0214%22 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0435%22 Apr
inferno8–130.0123%22 Apr
mirage15–150.0217%21 Apr
overpass13–20.1114%18 Apr
mirage13–70.0113%18 Apr
ancient13–100.0519%18 Apr
mirage7–130.0126%18 Apr
ancient13–110.0417%17 Apr
mirage16–130.0932%17 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0523%17 Apr
anubis13–50.0812%17 Apr
nuke3–130.0020%17 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0313%17 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0110%16 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0117%16 Apr
inferno13–40.0814%16 Apr
overpass13–50.0314%15 Apr
mirage13–110.0327%14 Apr
overpass13–100.0319%14 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0122%9 Apr
overpass9–130.0119%9 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0122%9 Apr
train13–110.0916%9 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0114%9 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0026%6 Apr
mirage13–9-0.028%5 Apr
overpass13–90.0119%5 Apr
nuke13–60.0926%5 Apr
mirage13–30.1229%5 Apr
overpass13–30.058%5 Apr
nuke10–130.0221%5 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0019%5 Apr
overpass10–130.0522%2 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0426%2 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0110%2 Apr
mirage11–130.0140%2 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0124%28 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0614%28 Mar
overpass11–130.0317%26 Mar
nuke13–90.0520%26 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0011%26 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →