M1mran — CS2 Stats

76561197989475618[U:1:29209890]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,089Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 Developing

Premier CS Rating10,110Blue band · top ~54.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#39385 of 55061 tracked

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,387 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47

Positioning50

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWLWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.7

Aggression7.4

Utility4.7

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7

Positioning5.0

Utility4.7

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time640ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms

Headshot accuracy16.6%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–6

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	29	17–12	59%	0.00
ancient	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.01
mirage	D	18	6–12	33%	-0.01
nuke	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.01
inferno	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.00
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.01
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,927Matches

50%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

77.9ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	1021	49%	0.98	14.8
Dust2	889	52%	0.99	15.0
Ancient	601	51%	1.01	15.7
Anubis	528	46%	0.97	14.7
Inferno	323	50%	0.97	14.3
Nuke	314	49%	1.05	15.7
Vertigo	283	51%	1.04	15.8
Overpass	113	57%	1.10	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy

31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.5%Spray accuracy

68.7%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

642msReaction time

40.6%T opening success

38.6%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

5.03HE damage / grenade

10.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4778 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 38.5955% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–2	0.01	7%	30 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.08	4%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	19%	29 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.00	12%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.07	4%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	12%	24 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.06	12%	24 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	21%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.11	19%	22 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	18%	20 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.04	12%	14 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	12%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	11%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	24%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	19%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	15%	9 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	32%	8 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	21%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.07	7%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	15%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	17%	5 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	8%	4 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	33%	26 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	17%	25 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.04	14%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	12%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.05	27%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	26%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.14	26%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	9%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	14%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	11%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	14%	18 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	11%	17 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	22%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	25%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	18%	9 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	21%	9 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	18%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	11%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	11%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.18	38%	6 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	16%	5 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	18%	5 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.02	21%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	20%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	18%	4 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	10%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.00	22%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	15%	4 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.02	16%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	18%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	18%	1 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	12%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.08	26%	13 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.03	24%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	16%	1 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	16%	29 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	13%	28 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	19%	28 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	16%	28 May →
anubis	11–13	0.02	23%	28 May →
mirage	12–16	0.04	17%	23 May →
dust2	13–3	0.09	15%	21 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	34%	20 May →
dust2	13–9	0.00	24%	20 May →
inferno	13–10	0.01	16%	14 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	12%	12 May →
ancient	7–13	0.04	11%	8 May →
dust2	16–13	0.01	9%	8 May →
nuke	2–13	-0.03	11%	4 May →
inferno	13–10	0.05	18%	1 May →
mirage	13–8	0.03	12%	23 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	13%	21 Apr →
ancient	8–13	0.00	16%	17 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.04	19%	16 Apr →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	13%	16 Apr →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	17%	15 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.07	12%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	13%	13 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.08	20%	13 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.06	12%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	14%	10 Apr →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	18%	9 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.04	23%	9 Apr →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	17%	6 Apr →
inferno	13–4	0.01	26%	4 Apr →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	20%	3 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	10%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.00	25%	1 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	27%	31 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	15%	28 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.04	27%	28 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.01	28%	28 Mar →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	26%	26 Mar →