[FA] SAND SPIDER — CS2 Stats

76561197987815047[U:1:27549319]

3,009Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating10,371Blue band · top ~52.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16454 of 22590 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

10,371Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 10,371
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,629 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[FA] SAND SPIDERFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER10,371 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning44
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41572Last 10041%Win rateLLWWLTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression4.5
Utility4.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time613ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy8.9%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 7.5% → last ⅓ avg 8.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–3
132Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
815In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2181338%-0.03
cacheD1651131%-0.01
anubisA149564%-0.01
mirageD124833%0.01
nukeC125742%-0.01
infernoD103730%-0.01
ancientA95456%-0.01
office3030%-0.03
overpass21150%0.02
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

8.7%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
606msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
4.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 8.6512% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.015%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.064%28 Aug
inferno13–8-0.022%28 Aug
cache13–90.0312%27 Aug
ancient1–130.0110%27 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0310%27 Aug
anubis13–8-0.018%27 Aug
cache9–13-0.017%25 Aug
anubis13–9-0.028%25 Aug
anubis8–130.0517%25 Aug
dust210–130.0811%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0016%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0019%24 Aug
mirage13–70.0510%24 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0113%24 Aug
dust27–13-0.038%24 Aug
nuke14–16-0.058%24 Aug
dust27–130.0112%21 Aug
mirage5–130.056%21 Aug
dust215–15-0.076%21 Aug
dust213–40.038%19 Aug
anubis13–11-0.048%19 Aug
mirage14–16-0.037%19 Aug
nuke11–13-0.058%17 Aug
anubis9–130.025%17 Aug
dust213–8-0.066%15 Aug
inferno9–13-0.029%15 Aug
ancient13–6-0.023%15 Aug
mirage13–80.035%15 Aug
anubis8–130.048%14 Aug
cache7–13-0.088%12 Aug
cache13–7-0.0215%12 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0010%12 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0610%10 Aug
ancient13–4-0.073%10 Aug
nuke13–40.088%10 Aug
anubis13–110.0018%10 Aug
cache13–8-0.045%10 Aug
cache8–130.016%10 Aug
nuke13–8-0.025%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0513%8 Aug
inferno11–130.0315%8 Aug
dust213–100.0010%8 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0314%7 Aug
cache11–130.0513%7 Aug
nuke11–130.027%7 Aug
anubis13–8-0.066%7 Aug
inferno11–130.0013%4 Aug
mirage11–13-0.027%4 Aug
nuke13–50.048%4 Aug
ancient13–100.0410%3 Aug
inferno13–60.017%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.042%3 Aug
anubis13–8-0.031%3 Aug
mirage4–130.044%31 Jul
mirage6–130.0612%31 Jul
mirage13–110.037%31 Jul
dust213–50.0714%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.024%31 Jul
cache13–80.078%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.0711%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.0611%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.063%31 Jul
cache2–13-0.0210%24 Jul
ancient3–130.025%24 Jul
nuke13–10-0.027%21 Jul
inferno10–13-0.035%21 Jul
dust21–13-0.063%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.0510%21 Jul
nuke13–16-0.090%19 Jul
dust25–13-0.117%19 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0812%19 Jul
anubis13–20.028%18 Jul
cache7–130.037%18 Jul
office3–13-0.073%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0210%17 Jul
anubis13–10-0.038%17 Jul
dust213–10-0.034%11 Jul
nuke11–13-0.047%11 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0512%10 Jul
nuke13–30.1112%10 Jul
cache13–11-0.026%10 Jul
dust213–6-0.0510%9 Jul
ancient13–11-0.039%9 Jul
dust213–8-0.027%9 Jul
office10–13-0.024%7 Jul
cache2–130.0210%7 Jul
vertigo13–110.044%7 Jul
office4–130.018%7 Jul
cache11–13-0.077%7 Jul
ancient13–100.018%30 Jun
dust28–13-0.082%30 Jun
overpass13–10-0.018%30 Jun
dust210–13-0.0214%26 Jun
dust26–13-0.070%21 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0312%21 Jun
anubis16–13-0.037%21 Jun
dust213–9-0.0210%12 Jun
overpass6–130.067%10 Jun
mirage13–110.018%10 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →