SansY — CS2 Stats

US76561197985899904[U:1:25634176]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,408Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,284Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning56

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–45–7Last 10048%Win rateTLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9

Aggression7.3

Utility5.1

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning5.6

Utility5.1

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time570ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms

Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–0Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 10mirageWeakest map · 35% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	18	10–8	56%	0.03
mirage	C	17	6–11	35%	0.00
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	0.01
inferno	C	14	5–9	36%	0.00
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	0.02
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.00
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.02
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

788Matches

49%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

79.8ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	206	50%	1.08	15.3
Ancient	130	45%	1.12	15.7
Inferno	112	47%	1.17	16.3
Anubis	104	49%	1.04	15.6
Dust2	72	44%	1.01	14.8
Nuke	69	52%	1.04	16.2
Vertigo	31	61%	1.21	17.8
Overpass	29	55%	1.05	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.9%Spray accuracy

82.3%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

566msReaction time

34.4%T opening success

58.2%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

12.54HE damage / grenade

6.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4678 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.4103% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	12–12	-0.06	28%	27 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	20%	25 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	18%	24 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	16%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.11	18%	20 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	21%	20 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.00	25%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.10	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	27%	18 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.03	39%	17 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	26%	12 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	12%	12 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	19%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	15%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.01	20%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.04	14%	9 Aug →
italy	5–13	0.00	32%	9 Aug →
boulder	13–4	0.05	20%	9 Aug →
train	13–7	-0.03	15%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.01	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	10%	8 Aug →
nuke	12–16	0.05	18%	8 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.09	14%	8 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.01	14%	8 Aug →
anubis	12–12	0.00	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	25%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–0	0.15	23%	8 Aug →
inferno	8–12	0.04	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.13	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	12%	8 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.05	19%	7 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.07	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	22%	6 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	17%	4 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	17%	30 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.09	8%	30 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.02	7%	28 Jul →
inferno	12–12	-0.01	10%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	23%	27 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.04	17%	26 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.06	13%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	18%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.01	22%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	14%	25 Jul →
boulder	6–13	0.06	35%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	27%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	11%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.05	16%	24 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.03	14%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	24%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	13%	23 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	16%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.12	22%	21 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	44%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	11%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	20%	20 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	16%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.18	30%	19 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	28%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.01	22%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.07	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.06	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.04	31%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.04	9%	19 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	16%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.11	24%	19 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	20%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	21%	18 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.01	14%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	16%	18 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.10	8%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.07	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	10%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	19%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	19%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	12%	17 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.06	18%	17 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	28%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.10	24%	16 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	11%	14 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	11%	14 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.05	16%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	25%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	22%	10 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.00	19%	10 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.02	26%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.08	14%	10 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	4%	29 Jun →