Sypht — CS2 Stats

76561197984010750[U:1:23745022]

3,053Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,000Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8904 of 20749 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,497 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSyphtFACEITLevel 7 · 1,497 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning59
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression6.3
Utility6.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.9
Utility6.9
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time585ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–1
131Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 92% over 13anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB189950%0.01
dust2B189950%0.02
mirageC167944%0.01
ancientB157847%0.01
nukeS1312192%0.03
cacheS128467%0.02
anubisD82625%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

732Matches
50%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
82.3ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11750%1.2316.0
Inferno8853%1.1816.1
Ancient7552%1.2917.6
Anubis7447%1.1316.2
Vertigo6543%1.1716.1
Dust24751%1.2517.8
Nuke4159%1.2718.4
Overpass2060%1.3318.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
590msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
12.16HE damage / grenade
7.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3633% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–130.0127%28 Aug
dust213–6-0.0315%27 Aug
inferno13–40.0933%27 Aug
ancient16–130.0215%24 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0223%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0132%23 Aug
inferno13–90.0129%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0326%23 Aug
ancient13–50.0314%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0727%22 Aug
cache1–13-0.067%22 Aug
dust23–130.0119%22 Aug
cache16–120.0341%22 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0643%22 Aug
mirage13–20.034%22 Aug
nuke13–70.0130%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0644%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0331%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.0129%16 Aug
inferno13–110.0313%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0028%16 Aug
anubis13–50.0628%16 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0227%16 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0226%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0217%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0719%15 Aug
inferno13–60.1223%13 Aug
dust213–110.0231%13 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0532%13 Aug
ancient8–130.0525%13 Aug
dust213–30.0221%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0419%12 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0320%12 Aug
dust213–70.0522%12 Aug
ancient11–130.0318%10 Aug
inferno10–130.0123%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0520%9 Aug
inferno0–9-0.2313%9 Aug
anubis8–130.0126%9 Aug
nuke13–50.0931%9 Aug
inferno13–10.1258%9 Aug
cache13–60.0831%9 Aug
anubis10–130.0321%8 Aug
inferno13–110.0124%8 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0514%8 Aug
dust212–16-0.0326%3 Aug
nuke10–130.0423%2 Aug
cache16–140.0830%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0117%2 Aug
dust213–70.0333%2 Aug
dust213–30.1243%2 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0116%2 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0119%31 Jul
mirage11–130.0820%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0026%27 Jul
cache13–80.1120%27 Jul
inferno13–90.0031%27 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0523%27 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0129%26 Jul
anubis7–130.0121%26 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0019%26 Jul
cache13–90.0337%25 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0123%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0416%19 Jul
anubis3–130.0021%19 Jul
cache4–13-0.0115%19 Jul
inferno8–130.0530%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0449%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.049%18 Jul
ancient13–80.0319%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.002%18 Jul
anubis13–160.0221%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0319%18 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0012%18 Jul
inferno9–130.0221%18 Jul
dust213–50.1026%18 Jul
ancient13–50.0822%18 Jul
nuke13–100.0136%18 Jul
mirage8–130.0320%18 Jul
cache16–130.0522%18 Jul
nuke13–110.0136%15 Jul
nuke13–60.1050%15 Jul
nuke13–80.0211%14 Jul
cache13–70.0021%14 Jul
dust213–10-0.0424%13 Jul
nuke13–40.0713%13 Jul
mirage13–30.1141%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0228%12 Jul
dust29–130.0637%12 Jul
cache13–7-0.0119%12 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0010%12 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0233%12 Jul
inferno10–130.0827%12 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0419%12 Jul
dust213–90.0632%12 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0124%12 Jul
dust210–130.0530%11 Jul
dust215–150.0124%11 Jul
mirage11–130.0823%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.0642%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →