MawZ — CS2 Stats

76561197983890200[U:1:23624472]✓ No bans

2,052Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,374Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,326 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning44

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateWLWWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression5.1

Utility4.2

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning4.4

Utility4.2

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time610ms−17ms

first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms

Headshot accuracy17.2%+3.0%

first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — cache 13–4

13–1Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 18anubisWeakest map · 22% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	D	18	4–14	22%	-0.04
cache	S	18	14–4	78%	-0.01
nuke	S	18	14–4	78%	-0.01
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	-0.04
ancient	S	15	11–4	73%	-0.01
mirage	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.02
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,755Matches

51%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

79.9ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	47	57%	1.01	15.6
Nuke	28	50%	0.85	13.8
Anubis	27	37%	0.83	14.2
Dust2	27	59%	1.00	17.0
Ancient	22	41%	0.86	12.7
Inferno	19	47%	0.83	14.6
Vertigo	10	80%	0.74	12.3
Overpass	3	67%	0.81	12.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

11.2°Preaim

609msReaction time

33.8%T opening success

44.1%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

4.8%Flash assists

11.77HE damage / grenade

2.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.5016 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.8349% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–8	0.01	14%	9 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	16%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	19%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	15%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.02	11%	9 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.10	26%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	19%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	8%	3 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	24%	3 Aug →
nuke	6–2	0.06	19%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	11%	3 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	11%	3 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	18%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	21%	3 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	9%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.06	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	34%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	15%	1 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.02	13%	1 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	8%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	21%	1 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	16%	1 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.02	14%	31 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	28%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	22%	28 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.05	7%	28 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.11	0%	28 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.00	17%	26 Jul →
nuke	4–3	-0.09	50%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	18%	26 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.04	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	18%	24 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.04	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	9%	20 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	12%	20 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.09	25%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	22%	19 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	16%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	11%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	15%	19 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.08	9%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.07	10%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.01	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	13%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.09	16%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.08	20%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	13%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.08	15%	17 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	13%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.08	20%	17 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	13%	16 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	8%	15 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.00	14%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.03	10%	15 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	17%	15 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.09	13%	15 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	11%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	19%	15 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.00	10%	14 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.01	19%	14 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	9%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.04	13%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	16%	14 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	15%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	10%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.11	18%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.11	6%	13 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.00	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	17%	12 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	14%	12 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.06	23%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	12%	12 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	12%	12 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	20%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	12%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.06	13%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	14%	11 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	10%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	18%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.08	16%	11 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	15%	11 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	15%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	29%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.03	19%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	5%	10 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	10%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.08	3%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	10%	10 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	13%	10 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.05	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.04	22%	10 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.02	10%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	13%	9 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.09	14%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.07	8%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	12%	9 Jul →