-\/-

-\/- — CS2 Stats

76561197977118689[U:1:16852961]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,155Tracked matches34%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,892Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4585 of 32922 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,923 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-\/-FACEITLevel 10 · 1,923 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,892 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning59
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36604Last 10036%Win rateLLLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2
Aggression8.6
Utility3.6
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.9
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time541ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 13–8
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 52% over 21infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2361726%0.02
mirageB21111052%0.04
anubisD1751229%0.03
ancientD124833%0.05
nukeC104640%0.07
infernoD92722%0.04
cacheB84450%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,245Matches
52%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
83.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25752%1.1817.4
Dust213652%1.1316.4
Ancient11249%1.2018.1
Inferno9354%1.2217.5
Nuke8852%1.1918.5
Anubis7151%1.0515.5
Train1662%1.3818.3
Overpass1421%1.1121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.1%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
534msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
57.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
3.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.454 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4922% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–130.0332%29 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0115%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.0325%27 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0121%26 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0121%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0319%25 Aug
nuke13–100.1128%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0624%24 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0214%24 Aug
mirage10–130.1018%23 Aug
mirage12–120.0537%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0324%22 Aug
anubis5–130.0910%22 Aug
cache13–110.1226%20 Aug
anubis6–130.0825%20 Aug
mirage5–130.1129%17 Aug
anubis13–90.0927%17 Aug
ancient9–130.0726%17 Aug
cache10–130.0222%17 Aug
dust20–13-0.0338%17 Aug
nuke1–130.0411%17 Aug
inferno8–130.0630%17 Aug
anubis10–130.0330%16 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0620%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0919%16 Aug
dust24–130.0522%16 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0423%16 Aug
ancient4–130.0520%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0018%16 Aug
dust213–60.1331%16 Aug
cache13–100.1124%16 Aug
anubis12–120.1124%16 Aug
inferno2–130.0019%16 Aug
dust26–130.0612%16 Aug
ancient13–60.1327%15 Aug
ancient9–130.1125%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0723%11 Aug
inferno16–140.0221%10 Aug
dust28–130.0727%9 Aug
inferno10–60.1132%9 Aug
inferno6–130.0119%9 Aug
inferno5–130.0027%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0220%9 Aug
dust21–130.0131%9 Aug
dust213–100.0920%8 Aug
anubis13–50.0722%8 Aug
nuke13–160.1434%8 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0222%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0227%8 Aug
cache13–90.1327%8 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0013%8 Aug
mirage19–160.0224%8 Aug
inferno4–130.0442%6 Aug
anubis5–130.0119%6 Aug
anubis4–130.0426%4 Aug
nuke6–130.1315%4 Aug
mirage5–130.0629%4 Aug
mirage13–30.1622%4 Aug
dust24–130.0513%4 Aug
mirage12–160.1122%3 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0216%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0122%2 Aug
inferno7–130.1324%2 Aug
ancient13–80.0721%2 Aug
dust213–80.1820%2 Aug
dust213–80.0020%2 Aug
dust28–130.0227%2 Aug
nuke13–80.1222%2 Aug
anubis9–130.0327%2 Aug
dust23–130.0137%2 Aug
nuke8–130.0635%2 Aug
nuke15–150.0317%1 Aug
anubis13–100.1021%1 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0129%1 Aug
dust28–13-0.0616%1 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0115%1 Aug
dust23–130.0425%1 Aug
nuke13–60.0423%1 Aug
dust216–140.1129%1 Aug
anubis9–130.0016%1 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0415%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0016%1 Aug
ancient13–90.1616%1 Aug
cache16–120.0114%1 Aug
mirage13–160.0712%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0029%1 Aug
dust215–15-0.0620%1 Aug
dust25–130.0026%1 Aug
cache9–130.0424%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0118%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0817%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0321%1 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0324%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0520%1 Aug
anubis13–50.0523%1 Aug
mirage13–40.1336%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0719%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0226%31 Jul
cache6–130.0829%31 Jul
nuke13–110.0915%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →