-Tactical-- — CS2 Stats
76561197969097413[U:1:8831685]
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 47% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 dust2 | A | 46 | 26–20 | 57% | 0.04 |
 cache | C | 21 | 9–12 | 43% | 0.03 |
 mirage | B | 19 | 9–10 | 47% | 0.03 |
 nuke | D | 8 | 2–6 | 25% | -0.00 |
 inferno | A | 5 | 3–2 | 60% | 0.00 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.02 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 19 | 53% | 1.37 | 18.9 |
| Inferno | 10 | 60% | 0.98 | 16.2 |
| Anubis | 6 | 50% | 1.03 | 18.0 |
| Vertigo | 6 | 33% | 1.25 | 20.7 |
| Dust2 | 5 | 20% | 1.28 | 16.4 |
| Nuke | 4 | 50% | 1.44 | 19.5 |
| Ancient | 4 | 75% | 1.27 | 20.0 |
| Cache | 2 | 50% | 1.22 | 14.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 7–13 | -0.02 | 30% | 25 Aug → | |
| cache | 6–13 | 0.01 | 26% | 25 Aug → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.02 | 25% | 25 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–16 | -0.01 | 31% | 25 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | 0.00 | 40% | 24 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.00 | 33% | 24 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.06 | 39% | 24 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–3 | -0.02 | 29% | 22 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.01 | 32% | 22 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.01 | 34% | 21 Aug → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.06 | 30% | 20 Aug → | |
| inferno | 16–12 | 0.01 | 27% | 19 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 16–13 | 0.03 | 11% | 19 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | -0.01 | 30% | 19 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.00 | 22% | 18 Aug → | |
| cache | 9–13 | -0.04 | 41% | 18 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–16 | 0.00 | 23% | 17 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–11 | -0.01 | 36% | 14 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.04 | 22% | 14 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 16–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 13 Aug → | |
| cache | 9–13 | 0.02 | 46% | 13 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 7–2 | 0.25 | 32% | 13 Aug → | |
| nuke | 7–9 | -0.02 | 35% | 12 Aug → | |
| cache | 2–13 | -0.01 | 38% | 12 Aug → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | 0.04 | 30% | 12 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.02 | 36% | 12 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.04 | 22% | 11 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | -0.02 | 29% | 11 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–2 | 0.08 | 36% | 11 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | 0.02 | 22% | 11 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 8–13 | -0.06 | 17% | 11 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.07 | 32% | 10 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | -0.07 | 25% | 10 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | 0.02 | 28% | 10 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.08 | 31% | 10 Aug → | |
| nuke | 3–13 | 0.02 | 47% | 10 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.01 | 35% | 9 Aug → | |
| cache | 10–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 9 Aug → | |
| nuke | 16–13 | -0.06 | 31% | 9 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–9 | -0.03 | 26% | 9 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.01 | 25% | 9 Aug → | |
| cache | 7–1 | 0.16 | 47% | 8 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.00 | 24% | 8 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.10 | 35% | 7 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 15–15 | 0.01 | 18% | 7 Aug → | |
| nuke | 12–12 | 0.03 | 27% | 4 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | 0.04 | 24% | 4 Aug → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.05 | 23% | 2 Aug → | |
| cache | 7–13 | -0.04 | 44% | 1 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–2 | -0.01 | 26% | 1 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | -0.04 | 32% | 1 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 1 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.01 | 35% | 1 Aug → | |
| mirage | 16–14 | -0.01 | 28% | 1 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.07 | 46% | 28 Jul → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.11 | 18% | 27 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | 0.12 | 27% | 27 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 12–12 | -0.07 | 34% | 27 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.03 | 26% | 27 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.16 | 35% | 24 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 12–12 | 0.07 | 21% | 24 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.06 | 30% | 22 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.01 | 33% | 22 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 10–13 | 0.09 | 23% | 22 Jul → | |
| nuke | 8–13 | -0.00 | 20% | 13 Jul → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 12 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.02 | 22% | 12 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.12 | 27% | 11 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 8–3 | 0.05 | 32% | 11 Jul → | |
| cache | 5–13 | 0.06 | 21% | 11 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | -0.01 | 19% | 9 Jul → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.03 | 38% | 9 Jul → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.08 | 24% | 8 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 7–13 | 0.01 | 39% | 8 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.03 | 32% | 6 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | 0.15 | 20% | 6 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.11 | 19% | 6 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.01 | 44% | 6 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.22 | 32% | 4 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | 0.07 | 59% | 4 Jul → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.04 | 13% | 4 Jul → | |
| nuke | 6–13 | 0.04 | 27% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.07 | 18% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 12–3 | 0.01 | 42% | 3 Jul → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.04 | 47% | 3 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.09 | 39% | 2 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.05 | 28% | 2 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.09 | 24% | 2 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.11 | 39% | 2 Jul → | |
| overpass | 10–13 | 0.02 | 15% | 2 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 12–12 | 0.04 | 27% | 29 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.03 | 17% | 29 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 4–9 | -0.02 | 29% | 29 Jun → | |
| cache | 2–13 | -0.00 | 24% | 29 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.02 | 33% | 20 Dec → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.03 | 26% | 20 Dec → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.08 | 59% | 20 Dec → | |
| inferno | 10–13 | -0.04 | 25% | 15 Jun → | |
| dust2 | 13–6 | 0.04 | 40% | 13 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.