sjeng — CS2 Stats

AU76561197968680141[U:1:8414413]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,336Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,359Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8692 of 25283 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning45

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression6.3

Utility6.8

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning4.5

Utility6.8

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time538ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–8

13–2Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

L5Current streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 55% over 20nukeWeakest map · 44% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	23	12–11	52%	-0.01
dust2	A	20	11–9	55%	-0.00
inferno	B	16	8–8	50%	0.01
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.00
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

63Matches

43%Win rate

0.89Avg K/D

74.5ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	14	71%	0.92	15.1
Ancient	11	36%	0.69	10.7
Dust2	11	27%	0.94	13.4
Inferno	8	38%	1.37	18.8
Anubis	6	33%	0.81	11.2
Nuke	5	40%	0.80	13.2
Cache	4	50%	0.97	18.3
Train	1	0%	0.58	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.8%Spray accuracy

76.6%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

537msReaction time

29.4%T opening success

46.9%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

11.09HE damage / grenade

14.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.4332% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	10–13	-0.05	16%	20 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	14%	18 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	17%	17 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	26%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	34%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	17%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	27%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.06	14%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.09	23%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	27%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.14	22%	16 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	41%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	15%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.11	23%	14 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.03	25%	12 Aug →
mirage	3–1	-0.11	0%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.07	21%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	16%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	30%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.02	15%	10 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.07	36%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.09	26%	10 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.01	15%	9 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	16%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.07	13%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	26%	4 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	13%	1 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.03	10%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	26%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.02	21%	31 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	21%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	13%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	30%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.00	18%	27 Jul →
mirage	16–19	-0.06	15%	24 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	18%	23 Jul →
mirage	19–17	-0.00	12%	23 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.02	13%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.00	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	12%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.05	23%	21 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	14%	21 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.05	8%	21 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.00	20%	21 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	23%	15 Jul →
dust2	12–9	-0.04	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	4%	14 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.00	21%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	22%	13 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.02	17%	13 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	15%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	31%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	28%	13 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.04	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.08	11%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	15%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	16%	13 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	11%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	25%	12 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.01	19%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	18%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	30%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	14%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	12%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	23%	11 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.07	16%	11 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.01	26%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	27%	10 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	20%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	9%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	11%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.09	30%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	17%	10 Jul →
italy	11–12	-0.06	9%	8 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	28%	8 Jul →
overpass	16–14	-0.01	25%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.01	10%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.01	20%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.06	15%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.00	17%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.05	18%	2 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.06	18%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	27%	2 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.03	18%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	14%	2 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	15%	2 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.00	19%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	20%	1 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.12	19%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.00	20%	1 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.07	24%	19 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	15%	19 Jun →
mirage	2–13	0.01	37%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.06	28%	19 Jun →
dust2	16–14	0.03	16%	17 Jun →