Jabalaye — CS2 Stats

76561197965212496[U:1:4946768]

863Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating11,890Blue band · top ~44.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#35853 of 52216 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,905 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJabalayeFACEITLevel 8 · 1,905 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER11,890 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning54
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5545Last 10055%Win rateLLLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression6.8
Utility4.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time590ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–7
131Biggest win — vertigo
8Longest win streak
L5Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS1812667%0.02
dust2A149564%0.03
anubisS1410471%0.02
ancientA149564%0.01
mirageC125742%-0.01
infernoD112918%0.01
vertigoB84450%0.00
overpassS64267%0.02
train2020%0.02
cache1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,583Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
80.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis7953%1.1016.5
Nuke7360%1.3317.1
Ancient6951%1.0316.2
Vertigo4657%1.1817.2
Dust24536%1.1717.3
Inferno4238%0.9115.4
Mirage4144%1.0015.2
Train2060%1.1017.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
67.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
568msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
13.13HE damage / grenade
4.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3452 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.9245% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–160.0516%27 Aug
dust29–130.0220%27 Aug
anubis7–130.0116%15 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0217%8 Aug
nuke6–13-0.036%8 Aug
ancient13–100.1214%8 Aug
ancient20–220.0117%3 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0116%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.1111%25 Jul
ancient13–100.0212%24 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0814%23 Jul
overpass13–50.0413%2 Jul
cache3–13-0.0820%2 May
inferno11–130.1022%2 May
nuke13–80.054%2 May
dust213–60.0224%1 Mar
overpass6–130.0324%1 Mar
anubis16–19-0.0213%25 Jan
mirage13–40.0720%24 Jan
dust213–5-0.0116%15 Jan
overpass13–70.0121%12 Jan
anubis13–9-0.0112%11 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0014%10 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0111%21 Dec
mirage5–130.0723%16 Dec
inferno7–13-0.0213%16 Dec
overpass13–100.0815%10 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0414%9 Dec
nuke13–30.0917%9 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0011%9 Dec
mirage13–110.0113%9 Dec
dust213–80.1218%8 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0324%24 Oct
mirage9–130.0018%17 Sept
dust213–110.0032%17 Sept
inferno14–160.0019%15 Sept
train9–130.0330%14 Sept
ancient7–10.0831%12 Sept
overpass13–20.0329%10 Sept
overpass10–13-0.0522%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0519%6 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0131%4 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0626%8 Jul
dust24–13-0.0023%8 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0617%7 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0224%27 Apr
dust22–130.0231%27 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0532%26 Apr
ancient13–100.0529%26 Apr
nuke13–30.0322%26 Apr
mirage0–13-0.0517%26 Apr
nuke4–130.0032%26 Apr
anubis7–130.0514%26 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0011%25 Apr
inferno8–130.0113%25 Apr
nuke13–70.0916%25 Apr
dust213–20.0324%25 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0116%25 Apr
anubis16–130.0528%24 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0424%24 Apr
dust213–50.0614%24 Apr
nuke13–110.0223%24 Apr
dust213–30.0022%24 Apr
nuke10–130.0326%24 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0424%22 Apr
dust29–13-0.0225%22 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0022%22 Apr
inferno13–50.0625%19 Apr
anubis11–130.0326%14 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0015%3 Mar
nuke13–90.0413%15 Feb
nuke13–80.0313%15 Feb
train10–130.0114%16 Nov
dust213–50.1223%7 Nov
anubis13–30.0727%1 Nov
nuke13–80.036%31 Oct
anubis13–70.0416%30 Oct
vertigo10–13-0.0411%25 Oct
ancient13–100.0215%25 Oct
nuke13–5-0.0111%11 Oct
nuke19–160.0417%3 Oct
nuke13–80.0417%23 Sept
ancient13–110.0413%22 Sept
vertigo13–70.0511%22 Sept
inferno16–140.0624%14 Sept
vertigo13–10-0.0326%14 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0115%13 Sept
vertigo13–30.1226%13 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0511%13 Sept
ancient13–70.0712%8 Sept
anubis16–13-0.0116%7 Sept
vertigo12–16-0.0817%6 Sept
anubis13–20.1030%2 Sept
dust213–70.1333%30 Aug
anubis13–70.0523%30 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0016%30 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0218%30 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0213%29 Aug
vertigo13–10.0517%24 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0728%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →