p8_I — CS2 Stats

FI76561197963428410[U:1:3162682]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,392Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,618Blue band · top ~30.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#22679 of 35967 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51

Positioning54

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateLLWWLWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.1

Aggression5.8

Utility6.2

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1

Positioning5.4

Utility6.2

Mechanics4.9

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time609ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms

Headshot accuracy12.8%−2.8%

first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–0Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 38% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	22	12–10	55%	-0.00
inferno	B	20	10–10	50%	-0.02
nuke	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.01
mirage	A	13	8–5	62%	0.00
cache	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.02
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
ancient	A	8	5–3	63%	-0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,798Matches

50%Win rate

0.87Avg K/D

74.6ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	158	53%	1.04	14.9
Mirage	142	44%	0.95	13.0
Ancient	137	45%	0.90	13.6
Dust2	127	51%	1.02	14.7
Inferno	101	51%	1.03	14.4
Nuke	73	64%	0.98	13.2
Vertigo	38	53%	0.99	13.2
Overpass	17	53%	0.95	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.2%Spray accuracy

72.2%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

598msReaction time

19.7%T opening success

59.3%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

8.0%Flash assists

9.24HE damage / grenade

15.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.528% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 19.7119% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	-0.05	12%	21 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	9%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.06	15%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	20%	21 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	29%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.04	9%	21 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	22%	21 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.09	10%	20 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.06	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	11%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	8%	20 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	11%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	13%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.00	16%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	16%	20 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	7%	20 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	15%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	16%	20 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	10%	19 Aug →
inferno	4–0	0.03	0%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	15%	19 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.07	13%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	10%	11 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.00	14%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.00	12%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.05	13%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.04	10%	8 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	13%	4 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.02	17%	31 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	12%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	16%	30 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	17%	30 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.13	4%	29 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	30%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.09	11%	29 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.02	9%	29 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	15%	29 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.03	23%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	6%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	13%	28 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	16%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.05	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	9%	28 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.06	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	16%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.00	8%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	11%	26 Jul →
train	7–13	-0.03	9%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	7%	26 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	18%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.06	9%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	17%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.02	14%	17 Jun →
overpass	6–13	-0.07	14%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	24%	16 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.03	30%	16 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	18%	15 Jun →
inferno	15–15	-0.06	13%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	13%	14 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.00	23%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.08	6%	14 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	9%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	17%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.01	13%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.03	12%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.05	18%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.05	9%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.01	21%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.00	8%	12 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.00	24%	12 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	9%	12 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	23%	10 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.07	16%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	21%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	13%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	24%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.05	18%	9 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.04	14%	9 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	19%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	23%	8 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.09	22%	7 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.01	10%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.01	18%	7 Jun →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	14%	6 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	13%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	18%	5 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.00	10%	5 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	12%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.18	23%	5 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.09	16%	4 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	14%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.03	6%	4 Jun →