XipeR — CS2 Stats

76561197960462449[U:1:196721]Steam profile ↗

1,563Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,005Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning55

Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression6.7

Utility7.9

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning5.5

Utility7.9

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time634ms−8ms

first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms

Headshot accuracy22.1%+2.4%

first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–11

13–2Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

L4Current streak

10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 38% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	27	12–15	44%	-0.00
mirage	C	21	8–13	38%	0.01
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	0.03
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	0.01
ancient	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.01
cache	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	0.02
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

918Matches

52%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

76.6ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	38	45%	0.90	14.0
Nuke	29	48%	0.92	14.9
Inferno	26	58%	0.99	14.2
Mirage	22	41%	0.78	12.7
Ancient	19	47%	0.95	14.1
Dust2	13	46%	1.06	14.5
Vertigo	11	27%	0.67	12.1
Overpass	4	25%	0.93	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.0%Spray accuracy

78.2%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

628msReaction time

29.4%T opening success

47.6%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

11.3%Flash assists

10.27HE damage / grenade

19.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.3804% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	14–16	0.00	11%	28 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	16%	27 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.01	24%	26 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	29%	25 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.03	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.02	30%	24 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	18%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.03	33%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	21%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.00	25%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	18%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.07	21%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	13%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	19%	14 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.03	24%	14 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	22%	14 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	19%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.11	23%	13 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	19%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.17	21%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	19%	26 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.09	33%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	24%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	17%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	8%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	16%	12 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	58%	9 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.07	20%	9 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	31%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.10	14%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.02	36%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.10	15%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.08	17%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.06	23%	21 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.02	28%	21 Jun →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	36%	20 Jun →
ancient	16–13	0.02	31%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	21%	14 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	20%	14 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	12%	14 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	10%	31 May →
dust2	15–15	0.01	20%	18 May →
mirage	13–8	0.09	26%	18 May →
ancient	3–13	-0.10	21%	18 May →
cache	7–13	0.11	31%	18 May →
nuke	9–13	0.11	23%	17 May →
nuke	11–13	0.03	28%	11 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	13%	10 May →
ancient	7–13	0.02	14%	10 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	28%	10 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	15%	10 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	15%	10 May →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	25%	10 May →
nuke	9–13	0.00	18%	9 May →
mirage	4–13	0.01	17%	9 May →
inferno	13–7	0.05	17%	9 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	10%	9 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	27%	9 May →
cache	3–13	-0.03	21%	2 May →
cache	13–8	-0.03	16%	1 May →
cache	13–7	-0.02	16%	1 May →
cache	13–6	0.04	19%	30 Apr →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	25%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–2	0.06	8%	26 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.08	23%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	20%	26 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.00	21%	26 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.03	17%	26 Apr →
anubis	13–16	0.03	24%	26 Apr →
dust2	8–2	-0.02	14%	26 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	10%	25 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	14%	19 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	10%	19 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	21%	19 Apr →
inferno	5–13	-0.10	21%	19 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.01	19%	13 Apr →
mirage	14–16	0.01	25%	12 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.10	27%	12 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.00	21%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.01	29%	12 Apr →
inferno	9–4	0.11	10%	12 Apr →
nuke	16–14	0.04	23%	12 Apr →
nuke	10–13	0.02	22%	8 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.09	29%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.07	30%	30 Mar →
nuke	13–9	0.09	31%	30 Mar →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	16%	29 Mar →
dust2	13–5	0.01	26%	29 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.00	14%	27 Mar →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	10%	26 Mar →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	20%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.07	15%	26 Mar →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	15%	21 Mar →
ancient	13–3	0.04	16%	21 Mar →
nuke	11–13	0.01	12%	21 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	24%	17 Mar →
overpass	7–13	-0.05	17%	17 Mar →
anubis	13–8	-0.06	31%	16 Mar →