NIF.

NIF. — CS2 Stats

76561197960321663[U:1:55935]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,258Tracked matches44%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,810Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7116 of 28527 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNIF.FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,810 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning51
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52435Last 10052%Win rateLLLLWTLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression4.3
Utility4.1
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.1
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time551ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–7
130Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
L4Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 21nukeWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2114767%0.02
mirageA2011955%0.00
infernoS1812667%0.03
nukeD1431121%0.01
cacheC135838%-0.01
ancientB84450%0.01
anubisB63350%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

98Matches
56%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
89.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1844%1.2218.3
Dust21145%1.3220.4
Anubis1070%1.4016.7
Inferno1060%1.2218.5
Ancient560%1.3421.4
Nuke4100%1.3816.5
Cache333%1.0724.7
Train1100%1.4423.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
549msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
12.62HE damage / grenade
3.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.2308 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5143% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0313%28 Aug
nuke14–160.0421%28 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0120%28 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0223%28 Aug
mirage13–60.0126%27 Aug
cache12–120.0119%27 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0523%26 Aug
inferno13–90.0529%25 Aug
ancient12–120.0717%25 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0219%25 Aug
inferno13–70.1418%24 Aug
dust213–80.0727%24 Aug
inferno13–100.0621%24 Aug
inferno11–130.0436%21 Aug
nuke12–120.0315%21 Aug
anubis13–90.1433%20 Aug
ancient11–130.0426%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0027%20 Aug
nuke13–90.0327%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0423%18 Aug
ancient13–50.0011%18 Aug
dust213–50.0424%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0321%18 Aug
dust213–30.0741%6 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0421%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0119%5 Aug
dust20–13-0.0619%4 Aug
nuke7–130.0415%4 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0827%31 Jul
cache8–13-0.0125%31 Jul
inferno13–110.0225%31 Jul
ancient13–40.0121%30 Jul
cache13–7-0.049%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0318%30 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0118%29 Jul
inferno13–50.0024%28 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0447%27 Jul
inferno16–130.0118%27 Jul
cache6–13-0.0726%27 Jul
dust28–13-0.0628%24 Jul
inferno13–50.0521%24 Jul
inferno13–90.0529%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0117%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0413%22 Jul
dust212–120.0126%21 Jul
cache9–130.0124%21 Jul
nuke9–130.0935%21 Jul
inferno13–50.0310%21 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0222%21 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0225%20 Jul
dust27–0-0.0657%17 Jul
cache8–13-0.0210%17 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0031%17 Jul
dust213–70.0124%17 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0323%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0620%16 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0426%16 Jul
dust26–13-0.0218%15 Jul
cache1–13-0.0850%15 Jul
nuke8–130.0433%15 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0430%15 Jul
mirage11–130.0425%15 Jul
mirage6–130.0019%14 Jul
inferno8–80.0132%14 Jul
nuke9–40.0431%14 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0330%14 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0122%14 Jul
dust213–10-0.0027%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0225%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0823%12 Jul
dust24–13-0.0224%12 Jul
nuke9–130.0731%12 Jul
dust213–00.0528%10 Jul
dust29–13-0.0322%10 Jul
inferno7–10.040%10 Jul
dust213–60.0932%9 Jul
inferno7–130.0521%8 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0326%2 Jul
dust213–80.0236%2 Jul
dust213–30.0524%2 Jul
mirage6–130.0029%2 Jul
cache9–130.0529%1 Jul
dust213–110.0731%1 Jul
nuke9–130.0233%1 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0129%1 Jul
mirage13–80.0916%1 Jul
anubis13–50.0433%1 Jul
ancient7–130.0023%29 Jun
dust216–120.0818%29 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0515%29 Jun
cache0–13-0.1117%29 Jun
cache13–60.0042%29 Jun
cache13–40.1139%29 Jun
dust216–140.0823%26 Jun
inferno13–30.0129%26 Jun
cache6–0-0.040%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0415%25 Jun
dust213–20.0524%25 Jun
cache13–110.1021%25 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0036%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →