m0NLEY-_-

m0NLEY-_- — CS2 Stats

76561199886208319[U:1:1925942591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

326Tracked matches62%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm0NLEY-_-FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning74
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58348Last 10058%Win rateWWWLLLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression10.0
Utility7.1
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning7.4
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time622ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 12–12
130Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
93In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 30infernoWeakest map · 50% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A44261859%0.05
mirageA30181260%0.07
infernoB20101050%0.03
nuke42250%0.04
ancient110100%0.03
cache110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

37Matches
46%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
81.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1060%1.2017.1
Inferno1030%1.2816.4
Dust2838%0.8612.6
Anubis333%1.2617.0
Overpass2100%1.1616.5
Ancient2100%0.7212.5
Nuke20%0.438.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
622msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
11.48HE damage / grenade
17.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6287% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.1124%29 Aug
dust213–60.1318%28 Aug
dust213–110.0911%22 Aug
dust210–130.0218%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0823%11 Aug
inferno11–130.0323%10 Aug
dust24–130.0111%10 Aug
dust212–120.1816%10 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0016%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0023%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0331%2 Aug
dust22–13-0.0513%1 Aug
inferno13–100.0217%1 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0111%30 Jul
dust29–130.0416%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0616%29 Jul
dust213–11-0.0117%27 Jul
mirage13–50.0718%27 Jul
dust213–40.0113%27 Jul
dust213–50.0013%27 Jul
dust22–13-0.0119%27 Jul
inferno13–60.0517%27 Jul
dust213–70.029%24 Jul
inferno13–30.1114%24 Jul
mirage13–50.1431%24 Jul
cache13–4-0.0211%24 Jul
dust24–130.0029%23 Jul
dust211–130.1336%23 Jul
dust28–10.1523%23 Jul
inferno2–130.0926%21 Jul
dust213–20.0324%21 Jul
dust213–40.0525%19 Jul
dust213–90.1432%18 Jul
mirage13–70.1217%18 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0119%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0814%17 Jul
nuke5–130.0224%17 Jul
mirage9–130.1025%17 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0220%16 Jul
dust24–60.0239%11 Jul
dust213–80.0621%27 Jun
mirage13–50.0217%26 Jun
inferno2–130.0138%26 Jun
mirage12–120.0720%26 Jun
dust213–90.0822%26 Jun
dust26–130.1213%25 Jun
dust213–70.0219%25 Jun
dust28–130.0724%25 Jun
nuke13–110.1518%24 Jun
mirage10–130.0420%24 Jun
mirage3–130.0822%24 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0412%24 Jun
inferno13–100.0624%23 Jun
mirage12–120.0716%23 Jun
dust213–80.0930%23 Jun
dust28–13-0.0323%23 Jun
inferno10–130.0614%22 Jun
mirage10–130.0323%22 Jun
dust213–9-0.0123%22 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0811%22 Jun
dust212–120.0113%22 Jun
mirage11–130.0814%21 Jun
dust213–50.1315%20 Jun
mirage13–50.079%20 Jun
dust213–110.0417%20 Jun
dust213–30.0139%20 Jun
dust213–70.0416%18 Jun
inferno10–1-0.0411%17 Jun
inferno10–130.0338%17 Jun
mirage9–130.0031%16 Jun
mirage13–00.0732%16 Jun
mirage13–60.1023%16 Jun
dust213–100.0411%16 Jun
inferno10–130.0533%16 Jun
inferno13–40.1316%14 Jun
dust20–13-0.0423%13 Jun
mirage4–10.0918%12 Jun
inferno13–10.0619%12 Jun
dust213–50.1118%12 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0321%12 Jun
mirage13–110.1217%12 Jun
dust212–120.0716%12 Jun
mirage13–40.1121%11 Jun
inferno5–130.0719%11 Jun
dust210–130.1319%11 Jun
mirage9–130.0818%11 Jun
dust212–12-0.0216%11 Jun
mirage13–70.1017%11 Jun
mirage13–40.0628%9 Jun
dust213–2-0.0323%9 Jun
dust213–60.0822%9 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0415%9 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0025%9 Jun
mirage13–60.1430%8 Jun
dust213–50.0022%8 Jun
mirage10–130.0724%8 Jun
inferno13–160.0011%7 Jun
mirage13–70.0720%7 Jun
dust28–130.1126%7 Jun
inferno13–60.0425%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →