Slatt™

Slatt™ — CS2 Stats

76561199858887143[U:1:1898621415]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

149Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.4 Learning
Premier CS Rating6,080Light Blue band · top ~73.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19248 of 25211 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlatt™PREMIER6,080 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim33
Positioning41
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.3
Aggression3.3
Utility4.1
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.3
Positioning4.1
Utility4.1
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time644ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 691ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy9.7%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 9.1% → last ⅓ avg 9.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 6–0
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1810856%-0.03
infernoC167944%-0.01
mirageB147750%-0.05
anubisD124833%-0.05
nukeC104640%-0.03
ancientB105550%-0.05
cacheS96367%-0.03
overpassA74357%-0.04
vertigo21150%-0.04
train110100%0.07
alpine1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.7%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
653msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
21.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
4.59HE damage / grenade
5.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.7235% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7479% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–13-0.0013%28 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0613%24 Aug
cache13–7-0.024%24 Aug
dust213–8-0.067%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.087%23 Aug
anubis6–13-0.025%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0710%23 Aug
ancient13–20.009%23 Aug
mirage16–14-0.099%23 Aug
dust213–6-0.0511%23 Aug
inferno9–130.008%23 Aug
inferno13–5-0.033%23 Aug
dust213–50.0117%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.095%22 Aug
cache6–2-0.0317%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.048%22 Aug
mirage12–50.0010%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0610%22 Aug
ancient13–11-0.037%22 Aug
cache13–8-0.0820%22 Aug
inferno3–9-0.118%22 Aug
inferno13–10-0.064%20 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0119%20 Aug
nuke14–16-0.036%18 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0119%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0514%16 Aug
ancient13–9-0.049%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.089%16 Aug
cache10–13-0.008%16 Aug
inferno6–00.1610%16 Aug
cache13–5-0.046%15 Aug
dust210–13-0.0212%12 Aug
ancient13–11-0.054%9 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0612%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.078%9 Aug
inferno3–130.047%9 Aug
inferno5–130.0513%9 Aug
mirage15–15-0.088%9 Aug
cache13–50.0214%9 Aug
cache13–3-0.017%4 Aug
train13–30.0711%25 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0210%25 Feb
overpass6–13-0.063%22 Feb
dust22–13-0.058%21 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0518%21 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0516%20 Feb
overpass13–70.004%20 Feb
nuke13–50.059%18 Feb
inferno10–10.0112%18 Feb
dust213–10.035%18 Feb
dust28–13-0.047%18 Feb
ancient13–16-0.0311%18 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0314%18 Feb
dust213–60.0013%13 Feb
dust213–30.0518%5 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0710%1 Feb
inferno13–50.069%1 Feb
dust213–50.0013%1 Feb
mirage13–110.0013%1 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0710%1 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0613%1 Feb
dust210–13-0.098%31 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0212%31 Jan
anubis13–8-0.039%31 Jan
mirage13–9-0.018%31 Jan
dust213–8-0.0415%31 Jan
dust210–13-0.0316%28 Jan
mirage13–7-0.059%28 Jan
alpine12–12-0.0210%24 Jan
overpass13–60.0116%24 Jan
dust24–13-0.073%24 Jan
inferno1–13-0.014%24 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0610%23 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0210%23 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0813%23 Jan
nuke13–6-0.046%23 Jan
mirage8–13-0.074%23 Jan
dust210–2-0.019%23 Jan
anubis13–11-0.048%23 Jan
mirage6–13-0.085%23 Jan
anubis13–4-0.0310%21 Jan
overpass13–3-0.0513%21 Jan
anubis2–13-0.0511%21 Jan
vertigo5–13-0.1112%21 Jan
mirage2–13-0.1019%21 Jan
anubis5–13-0.044%21 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0210%20 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0819%20 Jan
vertigo13–10.039%20 Jan
inferno7–13-0.019%20 Jan
nuke7–13-0.033%20 Jan
overpass7–13-0.062%19 Jan
dust213–8-0.0713%19 Jan
mirage9–13-0.107%19 Jan
anubis4–13-0.110%19 Jan
anubis4–13-0.106%19 Jan
nuke12–12-0.065%19 Jan
overpass13–9-0.1018%18 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0723%18 Jan
ancient13–8-0.080%18 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →