igorevna — CS2 Stats

76561199823329196[U:1:1863063468]✓ No bans

502Tracked matches38%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating3,179Grey band · top ~86.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40635 of 52208 tracked
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGigorevnaPREMIER3,179 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning44
Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35632Last 10035%Win rateWLWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression4.4
Utility1.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.3

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.4
Utility1.7
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy12.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–9
131Biggest win — nuke
3Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6cacheWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD33112233%-0.02
dust2D2992031%-0.02
infernoD1541127%-0.02
ancientA74357%0.01
cacheD61517%0.00
anubisS64267%0.04
nuke21150%0.02
train21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy
43.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
568msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
5.62HE damage / grenade
1.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6876% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3664 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.1771% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0910%30 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0220%30 Aug
dust213–80.0616%30 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0716%30 Aug
mirage13–110.033%30 Aug
dust213–8-0.0612%29 Aug
ancient13–70.017%29 Aug
mirage7–130.0112%29 Aug
cache9–130.0314%29 Aug
inferno9–130.0111%29 Aug
cache16–120.0114%28 Aug
cache15–15-0.078%28 Aug
mirage13–30.0113%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.039%28 Aug
ancient11–50.109%28 Aug
dust210–130.0610%28 Aug
mirage3–130.0625%28 Aug
dust211–130.0617%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.0214%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0616%27 Aug
anubis13–90.1617%27 Aug
mirage13–110.0727%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0110%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.087%26 Aug
cache5–130.026%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0317%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0517%25 Aug
mirage13–30.0211%25 Aug
inferno12–16-0.056%25 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0311%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.024%25 Aug
anubis13–50.0314%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0111%24 Aug
anubis16–120.1118%24 Aug
dust213–20.0819%24 Aug
mirage13–40.0116%24 Aug
inferno4–90.036%24 Aug
mirage3–13-0.075%22 Aug
dust213–7-0.033%22 Aug
mirage13–30.085%22 Aug
dust21–13-0.0514%22 Aug
inferno2–9-0.169%22 Aug
inferno5–9-0.026%22 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0311%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.076%21 Aug
cache11–130.0416%21 Aug
inferno2–13-0.018%21 Aug
dust25–130.0212%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.039%21 Aug
dust215–150.019%20 Aug
dust213–5-0.0110%20 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0111%20 Aug
nuke13–10.095%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.017%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0611%19 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0513%19 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0115%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0611%19 Aug
dust213–90.0411%19 Aug
dust214–16-0.0317%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.069%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0213%19 Aug
mirage5–13-0.029%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0815%19 Aug
inferno7–130.0411%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.052%19 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0418%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.017%19 Aug
dust213–10-0.0216%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.064%18 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0222%18 Aug
inferno13–9-0.064%18 Aug
dust213–6-0.030%18 Aug
dust213–16-0.0612%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1015%18 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0116%18 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0212%18 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0211%17 Aug
inferno9–130.0111%17 Aug
dust213–11-0.0320%17 Aug
mirage5–130.0411%17 Aug
dust212–16-0.048%17 Aug
inferno9–10.1314%17 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0714%17 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0618%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.0215%16 Aug
dust211–13-0.0518%16 Aug
dust24–130.0414%16 Aug
mirage3–130.0511%16 Aug
ancient3–13-0.028%15 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0212%15 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1214%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0910%15 Aug
mirage5–130.0316%15 Aug
mirage2–8-0.066%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1112%15 Aug
train1–13-0.016%15 Aug
train13–10-0.0224%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.027%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0911%14 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →