doom

doom — CS2 Stats

SK76561199801213715[U:1:1840947987]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

690Tracked matches46%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,424Blue band · top ~36.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5383 of 7788 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 481 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,424Peak Premier on CSDB
481Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 481
  • Next: Level 2 at 501 20 to go

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,424
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,576 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdoomFACEITLevel 3 · 481 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,424 · Blue bandPEAK ELO481csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning52
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression7.1
Utility5.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time657ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 717ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — cache 13–1
130Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 25nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2516964%-0.01
dust2A1810856%-0.00
ancientA1710759%-0.01
nukeD123925%-0.01
cacheB105550%0.03
infernoC94544%-0.02
anubisD93633%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

169Matches
46%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
69.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5951%0.8813.3
Dust23746%0.8112.0
Ancient2250%0.9514.6
Cache1540%0.9914.9
Anubis1323%0.8714.2
Nuke1225%0.9015.1
Inferno1060%1.0714.4
Overpass1100%1.3818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
644msReaction time
41.4%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.53HE damage / grenade
6.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.1326% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0529%27 Aug
cache0–13-0.0722%27 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0529%27 Aug
ancient13–110.0621%27 Aug
dust216–14-0.0718%26 Aug
ancient6–12-0.1123%25 Aug
dust213–80.0527%24 Aug
cache10–13-0.0128%24 Aug
nuke3–130.0465%24 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0810%24 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1338%23 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0330%23 Aug
ancient13–90.0333%23 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0233%23 Aug
cache11–130.0228%23 Aug
inferno7–130.0317%22 Aug
mirage13–20.0416%22 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0120%22 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0223%22 Aug
mirage13–80.0126%22 Aug
nuke12–160.0123%22 Aug
mirage12–120.0320%22 Aug
cache14–16-0.0723%20 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0827%19 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0529%18 Aug
cache13–100.0316%18 Aug
dust213–8-0.0420%16 Aug
dust213–3-0.0629%16 Aug
dust216–130.0423%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.037%16 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0820%16 Aug
ancient13–100.0126%16 Aug
nuke13–110.0121%16 Aug
ancient13–40.0129%16 Aug
dust213–80.0235%16 Aug
dust26–13-0.0626%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.046%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0324%15 Aug
dust210–13-0.0417%15 Aug
ancient6–130.0118%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0030%15 Aug
cache7–13-0.0030%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0326%15 Aug
cache13–90.0438%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0038%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0113%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0516%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0437%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0016%13 Aug
mirage16–140.0920%11 Aug
inferno16–130.0121%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0519%10 Aug
nuke11–130.1019%10 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0113%6 Aug
cache13–90.0923%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.0713%5 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0222%5 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0523%5 Aug
nuke16–120.0418%4 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0545%4 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0624%4 Aug
nuke11–130.0019%3 Aug
mirage13–60.0835%2 Aug
dust213–100.0216%2 Aug
mirage16–130.0222%2 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0018%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0213%2 Aug
ancient13–90.0017%2 Aug
anubis13–100.0029%2 Aug
cache13–10.2035%2 Aug
ancient13–40.0622%2 Aug
dust29–130.0318%2 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0230%1 Aug
anubis8–130.0430%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0416%1 Aug
mirage13–70.0030%1 Aug
dust210–130.0521%1 Aug
anubis5–130.0321%1 Aug
dust22–13-0.0130%1 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0316%1 Aug
mirage13–40.0133%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0712%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0230%30 Jul
dust213–60.1216%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0425%27 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0620%26 Jul
inferno13–100.0230%26 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0725%26 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0813%26 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0617%26 Jul
anubis13–160.0220%25 Jul
mirage15–150.0240%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0424%25 Jul
dust213–00.0538%25 Jul
cache13–60.0533%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0314%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0838%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0616%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0611%25 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0627%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →