Strawkibs

Strawkibs — CS2 Stats

76561199733255670[U:1:1772989942]Steam profile ↗

613Tracked matches34%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,202 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStrawkibsFACEITLevel 6 · 1,202 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning58
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY484210Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression8.3
Utility5.6
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 679ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time675ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 675ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–5
131Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13mirageWeakest map · 30% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27171063%0.04
mirageD2371630%0.01
ancientS139469%0.04
infernoA106460%0.04
nukeD103730%-0.01
anubisA74357%0.02
cache32167%0.01
overpass3030%-0.02
office2020%0.00
train1010%0.01
vertigo1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

65Matches
55%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
69.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2259%0.8912.9
Dust21747%0.8814.5
Ancient1553%0.9714.7
Nuke967%0.8712.7
Inferno250%0.6911.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.1%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
679msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
59.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.58HE damage / grenade
11.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9404% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0219%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0116%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0216%29 Aug
inferno13–70.0622%29 Aug
dust213–160.1422%29 Aug
cache13–5-0.0423%29 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0520%29 Aug
mirage13–50.0428%28 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0418%28 Aug
dust211–13-0.0610%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0442%28 Aug
dust213–70.0027%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0535%28 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0526%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0421%28 Aug
inferno13–30.0821%28 Aug
mirage12–120.0526%28 Aug
mirage6–130.0017%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0224%28 Aug
dust213–10-0.0114%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0619%27 Aug
ancient13–60.0416%27 Aug
dust210–20.1342%27 Aug
ancient10–130.0428%27 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0124%27 Aug
inferno13–110.0922%27 Aug
mirage4–130.1537%27 Aug
nuke4–8-0.0140%20 Aug
dust25–130.0333%19 Aug
inferno9–50.2133%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0226%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0621%14 Aug
dust210–50.0022%14 Aug
ancient16–130.0323%6 Aug
dust213–20.1016%6 Aug
mirage1–13-0.014%22 Jul
dust212–120.1225%17 Jul
dust21–13-0.0748%14 Jul
office11–13-0.0620%4 Jul
train12–120.0157%4 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0022%4 Jul
dust22–0-0.04100%4 Jul
dust213–80.1130%3 Jul
ancient13–40.0236%3 Jul
dust213–90.1242%1 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0414%26 Jun
dust213–100.0633%26 Jun
mirage4–40.0122%26 Jun
mirage10–130.0423%25 Jun
dust213–70.1033%25 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0739%24 Jun
dust213–70.0343%19 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0326%19 Jun
ancient13–70.0218%15 Jun
ancient9–130.1123%11 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0323%11 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0621%11 Jun
anubis3–10.1853%11 Jun
anubis13–50.1120%29 May
dust213–60.1027%29 May
mirage12–120.0628%29 May
dust21–6-0.0110%29 May
dust29–130.0315%28 May
anubis13–4-0.0317%28 May
mirage13–70.0022%28 May
inferno0–7-0.0527%26 May
dust213–20.0031%18 May
office8–130.0629%14 May
mirage13–10-0.0719%14 May
mirage13–80.1524%8 May
ancient13–30.1333%8 May
anubis5–13-0.0510%7 May
inferno9–130.0420%7 May
nuke12–120.0733%7 May
cache13–80.0429%2 May
cache12–120.0123%30 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0139%23 Apr
inferno13–100.0329%23 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0029%23 Apr
nuke13–10.0328%22 Apr
inferno8–13-0.088%22 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0521%21 Apr
mirage13–90.0525%21 Apr
dust212–120.1033%21 Apr
mirage15–150.0624%20 Apr
dust213–100.0331%19 Apr
ancient13–90.0819%17 Apr
dust213–10.1038%17 Apr
overpass12–120.0337%17 Apr
dust213–60.0325%17 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0314%17 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0338%16 Apr
ancient13–60.0631%16 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0222%16 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0426%15 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0625%15 Apr
anubis12–12-0.0019%15 Apr
ancient13–110.0332%15 Apr
inferno13–60.0824%11 Apr
vertigo9–130.0417%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →