DZL (ON MY MAMA)

DZL (ON MY MAMA) — CS2 Stats

US76561199591430041[U:1:1631164313]Steam profile ↗

3,369Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating18,859Purple band · top ~13% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10365 of 21005 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,051 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDZL (ON MY MAMA)FACEITLevel 5 · 1,051 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,859 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning43
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression6.0
Utility6.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.3
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time647ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–4
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
813In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 26nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2617965%-0.00
mirageB1991047%-0.02
dust2C125742%-0.02
anubisB126650%-0.01
nukeD93633%-0.04
infernoC83538%-0.04
ancientC73443%-0.00
train32167%-0.01
office2020%-0.05
overpass110100%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

551Matches
50%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
75.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15953%0.8913.7
Inferno7645%0.9513.9
Dust27539%0.8413.2
Ancient7059%0.8914.0
Nuke5252%0.8013.3
Anubis4050%0.9314.5
Overpass3244%1.0415.2
Cache2157%0.9013.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
643msReaction time
23.0%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
5.65HE damage / grenade
16.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.9931% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.0612%28 Aug
cache13–11-0.0413%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0027%25 Aug
cache9–130.0313%18 Aug
mirage3–130.0617%16 Aug
dust213–00.0833%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0413%16 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0114%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0116%15 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0318%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0513%8 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0511%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0822%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0835%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0017%5 Aug
mirage14–16-0.037%2 Aug
mirage13–60.0519%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0220%2 Aug
dust216–14-0.0017%2 Aug
cache13–80.0519%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0516%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.0020%2 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0714%1 Aug
dust213–8-0.0223%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0418%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0018%1 Aug
cache13–11-0.0023%1 Aug
dust26–13-0.137%1 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0213%1 Aug
inferno5–13-0.088%1 Aug
dust25–13-0.0611%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.0230%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0429%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.0910%31 Jul
nuke6–130.0229%31 Jul
cache13–100.0015%27 Jul
dust213–70.0319%27 Jul
cache13–40.1219%26 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0512%26 Jul
cache13–4-0.0325%26 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0810%25 Jul
cache0–13-0.0212%25 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0224%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0816%25 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0020%25 Jul
ancient13–40.0211%25 Jul
cache11–130.0327%25 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0123%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0414%24 Jul
cache13–90.0312%24 Jul
cache16–130.0233%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0724%24 Jul
cache13–5-0.0223%24 Jul
cache13–100.0116%24 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0523%24 Jul
office1–13-0.0643%24 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0416%24 Jul
anubis8–20.0341%24 Jul
train13–11-0.0515%24 Jul
cache13–5-0.0321%24 Jul
dust215–150.0623%24 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0330%23 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0120%23 Jul
mirage13–30.0212%23 Jul
cache16–120.0214%23 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0914%23 Jul
anubis13–20.1221%23 Jul
mirage13–60.0216%23 Jul
cache11–130.0319%23 Jul
anubis13–30.0310%23 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0013%23 Jul
train8–13-0.0235%23 Jul
train7–00.0514%23 Jul
cache12–12-0.0415%23 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0411%23 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0217%23 Jul
inferno9–13-0.1023%23 Jul
dust213–90.0121%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0314%23 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0715%22 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0216%22 Jul
cache13–70.0625%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0521%22 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0112%22 Jul
vertigo13–90.0227%22 Jul
office11–13-0.0515%22 Jul
cache13–40.0612%22 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0113%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0115%22 Jul
inferno13–00.0122%20 Jul
nuke6–13-0.140%20 Jul
mirage11–130.0320%20 Jul
nuke2–13-0.067%20 Jul
cache13–5-0.0119%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0118%20 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0216%20 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0416%20 Jul
ancient11–130.0514%20 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0214%19 Jul
anubis13–80.0314%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →