Benson B. Mcbuttchuggle — CS2 Stats

CA76561199588353623[U:1:1628087895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

756Tracked matches43%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingClutch Specialist

Premier CS Rating14,745Blue band · top ~29.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#31568 of 51180 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56

Positioning48

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–44–7Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim5.6

Aggression5.5

Utility5.5

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6

Positioning4.8

Utility5.5

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time581ms+0ms

first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms

Headshot accuracy14.0%−2.5%

first ⅓ avg 16.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 6–13

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

13–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 58% over 24nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	24	14–10	58%	-0.01
cache	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.00
ancient	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.02
inferno	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
dust2	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	0.00
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches

67%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

67.5ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	100%	1.22	13.5
Dust2	1	0%	0.60	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy

35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.9%Spray accuracy

75.3%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

583msReaction time

28.3%T opening success

46.1%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

3.9%Flash assists

9.73HE damage / grenade

8.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.0958% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.3117% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	11–13	0.02	16%	30 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	14%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.08	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.10	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	16%	25 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.00	20%	24 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.01	9%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	24%	24 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	20%	24 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	27%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	23%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	12%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.07	23%	24 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.13	24%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	10%	23 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.05	19%	22 Aug →
cache	6–5	-0.02	6%	22 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	14%	22 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	10%	22 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.05	7%	21 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.07	11%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.07	8%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	9%	20 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	15%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	7%	19 Aug →
ancient	2–2	-0.04	0%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	12%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	14%	19 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.06	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	5%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.07	23%	18 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	11%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	14%	17 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.00	15%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.07	14%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	15%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	14%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.10	23%	15 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	13%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	12%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	7%	13 Aug →
debris	9–4	0.02	16%	13 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	6%	12 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.02	11%	12 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.09	15%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	13%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	18%	10 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	13%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	29%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	17%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	6%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	26%	7 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	14%	6 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	15%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	10%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	16%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	16%	4 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.04	12%	4 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.00	15%	4 Aug →
inferno	8–8	-0.03	28%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	15%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.07	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	8%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	10%	2 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.13	23%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	6%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	14%	2 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.03	19%	2 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.06	6%	2 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.00	8%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	11%	1 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.06	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	11%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	28%	1 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	6%	1 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.10	24%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	15%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	22%	29 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.03	17%	29 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	16%	29 Jul →
ancient	12–16	0.03	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	3–11	-0.02	31%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	16%	28 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.08	27%	28 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.02	11%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.01	13%	27 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.03	25%	27 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.06	30%	27 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	21%	27 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	15%	26 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	15%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.13	20%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	15%	26 Jul →