Joeseph — CS2 Stats

76561199576094007[U:1:1615828279]

2,096Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,613Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6121 of 29872 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoesephFACEITLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,613 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning61
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48466Last 10048%Win rateLLTWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression8.5
Utility4.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.1
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time602ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−5.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — ancient 13–1
130Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA34201459%0.03
mirageB23111248%0.02
infernoD113827%0.02
ancientA117464%0.05
anubisD93633%-0.00
nukeC73443%0.00
dust241325%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

487Matches
55%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
89.2ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19459%1.4020.1
Anubis7549%1.2718.9
Ancient6652%1.1917.6
Vertigo5056%1.3719.0
Inferno3441%1.1618.6
Nuke2458%1.3019.5
Overpass2070%1.4018.9
Dust21354%1.0818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
589msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
8.57HE damage / grenade
4.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.135% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–16-0.0214%29 Aug
anubis7–130.0232%29 Aug
inferno15–150.0915%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0723%26 Aug
cache13–7-0.0126%24 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0010%24 Aug
cache10–13-0.0026%24 Aug
inferno4–130.0215%24 Aug
cache3–4-0.0620%23 Aug
mirage6–130.0830%23 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0332%22 Aug
inferno13–11-0.039%22 Aug
anubis8–130.0018%21 Aug
cache13–9-0.036%20 Aug
anubis13–80.0115%19 Aug
mirage13–100.0524%19 Aug
dust210–130.0333%16 Aug
cache13–8-0.0421%16 Aug
cache6–130.0418%16 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0821%16 Aug
anubis7–130.0018%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0022%15 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0419%15 Aug
cache13–0-0.040%15 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0435%15 Aug
cache13–80.0220%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0025%15 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0311%15 Aug
cache13–20.0515%15 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0217%15 Aug
mirage16–120.0231%14 Aug
ancient14–160.0415%31 Jul
cache7–130.0016%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0421%30 Jul
inferno4–130.1130%26 Jul
cache15–150.0219%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0830%26 Jul
cache13–40.0829%25 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0224%25 Jul
anubis4–130.0231%25 Jul
mirage13–110.1130%25 Jul
inferno13–30.0919%25 Jul
ancient13–60.0320%25 Jul
cache15–150.0421%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0322%25 Jul
ancient13–10.2119%25 Jul
nuke13–80.0522%24 Jul
cache4–13-0.0225%24 Jul
ancient10–130.0723%24 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0122%24 Jul
ancient13–110.0325%23 Jul
anubis13–70.0116%23 Jul
cache13–30.0219%23 Jul
mirage4–130.0123%23 Jul
ancient13–1-0.019%23 Jul
ancient13–80.0431%23 Jul
cache13–60.0925%23 Jul
mirage13–80.1317%23 Jul
cache13–50.0221%23 Jul
nuke11–130.0422%18 Jul
ancient13–110.0719%18 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0124%18 Jul
nuke13–60.0619%18 Jul
dust24–13-0.057%18 Jul
inferno8–130.0522%18 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0216%18 Jul
ancient13–30.1519%18 Jul
cache16–140.0124%18 Jul
mirage2–130.0433%17 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0133%4 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0422%3 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0417%2 Jul
cache13–7-0.0323%2 Jul
cache13–100.0230%26 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0113%23 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0234%22 Jun
dust20–13-0.0410%21 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0738%21 Jun
mirage3–6-0.060%21 Jun
inferno13–160.0242%20 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0819%7 Jun
ancient13–160.0116%6 Jun
mirage13–60.0730%6 Jun
cache12–120.0425%6 Jun
mirage10–130.0024%6 Jun
mirage2–7-0.0413%1 Jun
cache10–13-0.0033%31 May
cache5–130.0421%17 May
dust213–10-0.0041%17 May
cache13–00.0318%17 May
cache5–13-0.0220%17 May
mirage13–10.0730%16 May
cache13–70.1430%15 May
cache6–13-0.0128%10 May
cache13–30.1628%10 May
cache13–40.1250%9 May
cache13–80.0721%9 May
cache12–120.0929%7 May
cache9–130.1319%7 May
cache13–110.0731%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →