FateMeansHope

FateMeansHope — CS2 Stats

76561199575798876[U:1:1615533148]Steam profile ↗

3,465Tracked matches61%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,205Blue band · top ~32.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9801 of 14668 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFateMeansHopePREMIER14,205 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning59
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateTWLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression9.3
Utility3.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.9
Utility3.4
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time584ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–9
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
144In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 20anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25131252%0.03
nukeB25131252%0.03
dust2S2014670%-0.01
cacheA95456%0.01
ancientD82625%-0.01
infernoA74357%0.02
anubisD61517%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

241Matches
47%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
80.2ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke5657%1.1216.3
Mirage5645%1.0214.6
Ancient3441%0.9515.6
Inferno2741%1.0313.8
Anubis2564%1.2815.8
Dust22536%0.9915.9
Vertigo1839%0.8213.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
583msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
7.36HE damage / grenade
4.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5351% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0510%27 Aug
cache13–30.148%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.030%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.0426%26 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0410%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0319%26 Aug
dust213–50.0111%24 Aug
mirage13–50.0612%24 Aug
inferno13–60.0116%24 Aug
nuke10–130.0120%24 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1121%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0210%23 Aug
dust213–100.0125%23 Aug
nuke13–40.1022%23 Aug
mirage13–110.1424%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0750%22 Aug
inferno10–130.0323%21 Aug
mirage9–130.096%21 Aug
dust213–110.0121%18 Aug
nuke11–130.0013%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0418%15 Aug
nuke13–110.0417%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.0219%15 Aug
dust21–13-0.0630%15 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0914%15 Aug
mirage13–110.0218%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.040%14 Aug
dust213–30.0421%13 Aug
cache15–150.0412%12 Aug
nuke13–110.0526%10 Aug
dust213–11-0.0213%9 Aug
mirage10–130.049%9 Aug
ancient3–130.0210%8 Aug
nuke13–40.1315%8 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0915%7 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0121%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0316%5 Aug
anubis13–80.028%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0733%5 Aug
inferno9–60.126%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0836%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0410%4 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0112%4 Aug
cache4–13-0.095%4 Aug
nuke13–16-0.030%3 Aug
dust213–100.039%1 Aug
cache10–130.049%1 Aug
cache6–13-0.0110%29 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0427%28 Jul
mirage16–130.005%28 Jul
anubis7–130.044%27 Jul
mirage11–130.024%27 Jul
nuke13–40.0717%27 Jul
dust216–14-0.0017%26 Jul
nuke10–130.0318%26 Jul
mirage13–40.1512%26 Jul
nuke13–60.1618%26 Jul
dust23–30.0014%25 Jul
mirage3–130.067%25 Jul
ancient4–130.0617%25 Jul
mirage13–90.2016%24 Jul
nuke7–130.0617%24 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0514%23 Jul
dust213–90.0226%23 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0215%22 Jul
dust213–8-0.009%22 Jul
nuke13–90.089%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0422%22 Jul
nuke6–13-0.048%22 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0740%21 Jul
cache13–70.074%21 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0214%20 Jul
cache13–8-0.100%20 Jul
ancient10–130.0111%19 Jul
nuke10–130.0024%19 Jul
dust24–13-0.086%19 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0518%19 Jul
inferno13–50.0713%19 Jul
cache13–70.0113%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0423%15 Jul
nuke13–30.1220%15 Jul
mirage13–20.0116%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0222%11 Jul
mirage8–130.015%11 Jul
dust213–5-0.0238%11 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0311%10 Jul
dust213–20.0924%10 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0216%10 Jul
nuke13–80.118%10 Jul
inferno4–130.0027%9 Jul
mirage9–130.0630%9 Jul
nuke11–130.0615%9 Jul
inferno9–13-0.1128%8 Jul
dust213–110.0221%8 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0333%5 Jul
mirage15–150.0622%4 Jul
nuke6–130.0442%4 Jul
nuke13–40.0429%3 Jul
anubis1–6-0.0817%30 Jun
nuke13–11-0.037%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →