Gabit0-

Gabit0- — CS2 Stats

76561199572411114[U:1:1612145386]Steam profile ↗

1,912Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating10,767Blue band · top ~50.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10432 of 14395 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,073 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGabit0-FACEITLevel 5 · 1,073 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER10,767 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning56
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44515Last 10044%Win rateLTLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression7.9
Utility5.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time637ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–8
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 14dust2Weakest map · 38% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC35152043%0.03
dust2C29111838%0.01
nukeB147750%0.01
ancientC104640%0.02
infernoB63350%0.04
anubis32167%0.02
train21150%-0.02
cache110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,140Matches
47%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
88.3ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage37149%1.3218.6
Dust225350%1.2518.3
Inferno13346%1.1016.9
Anubis13046%1.2018.2
Ancient11845%1.0917.0
Nuke7044%1.0616.3
Vertigo2148%1.0314.1
Overpass2040%1.2720.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
624msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
11.68HE damage / grenade
8.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5137% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–12-0.025%22 Aug
mirage15–150.0923%20 Aug
nuke8–130.0625%20 Aug
mirage16–140.0521%19 Aug
dust213–110.0520%13 Aug
dust213–110.0935%10 Aug
mirage13–50.0833%10 Aug
ancient11–130.0125%10 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0515%10 Aug
ancient14–160.0830%10 Aug
ancient13–60.0623%10 Aug
dust213–40.0134%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0515%10 Aug
mirage13–70.0425%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0231%3 Aug
mirage12–120.1226%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0428%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0513%3 Aug
inferno12–120.0413%3 Aug
dust213–70.0524%3 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0422%27 Jul
dust211–130.0326%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0115%23 Jul
dust25–13-0.0520%21 Jul
dust28–130.0528%19 Jul
dust214–160.0118%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0321%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0129%18 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0733%11 Jul
mirage6–130.0329%11 Jul
nuke13–40.1121%11 Jul
dust213–20.0632%9 Jul
mirage12–160.0223%9 Jul
dust215–150.0419%9 Jul
cache13–90.0525%7 Jul
anubis13–50.0230%7 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0024%27 Apr
dust27–130.0022%23 Apr
mirage8–130.0336%22 Apr
inferno10–130.0147%13 Apr
nuke13–100.0034%11 Apr
nuke17–190.0628%30 Mar
nuke5–3-0.0213%29 Mar
anubis7–130.0316%25 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0315%19 Mar
dust25–130.0220%21 Feb
mirage13–30.0852%21 Feb
nuke2–130.0137%21 Feb
mirage13–80.1441%18 Feb
dust211–130.0517%9 Feb
mirage13–90.0925%9 Feb
dust28–13-0.0128%4 Feb
nuke13–70.0434%3 Feb
inferno13–100.0733%2 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0129%29 Jan
dust211–130.0023%18 Jan
mirage13–50.0723%3 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0126%3 Dec
inferno9–20.1120%1 Dec
mirage9–130.0016%1 Dec
dust213–100.0325%26 Nov
ancient9–130.0827%26 Nov
mirage19–170.0325%24 Nov
mirage14–160.0529%22 Nov
inferno7–130.0118%17 Nov
ancient13–4-0.0122%13 Nov
dust23–13-0.0314%12 Nov
dust29–13-0.0113%12 Nov
dust29–130.0232%11 Nov
ancient13–80.0118%11 Nov
dust222–200.0621%10 Nov
dust24–13-0.0315%9 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0742%5 Nov
mirage13–60.0620%3 Nov
mirage13–6-0.0315%29 Oct
mirage6–13-0.1011%28 Oct
mirage7–13-0.0723%27 Oct
mirage13–160.0918%20 Oct
ancient13–160.0319%20 Oct
train13–60.0425%20 Oct
nuke13–10-0.0920%19 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0520%16 Oct
ancient6–130.0112%16 Oct
nuke13–30.0326%16 Oct
nuke13–7-0.0025%15 Oct
inferno13–100.0235%12 Oct
dust213–90.0317%12 Oct
mirage13–60.1442%12 Oct
mirage10–130.0829%12 Oct
train6–13-0.0821%6 Oct
mirage13–7-0.0222%6 Oct
nuke6–13-0.0825%5 Oct
dust213–50.0317%5 Oct
nuke15–150.1416%5 Oct
dust213–6-0.0424%5 Oct
dust24–130.009%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0335%9 Sept
mirage5–130.1120%7 Sept
mirage9–130.0324%7 Sept
dust210–130.0217%5 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →