Horst Lichter

Horst Lichter — CS2 Stats

DE76561199563560690[U:1:1603294962]Steam profile ↗

957Tracked matches60%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 Solid
Premier CS Rating15,825Purple band · top ~25.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30459 of 53190 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 995 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHorst LichterFACEITLevel 5 · 995 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,825 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning40
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression2.6
Utility6.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 11% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 718ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time720ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 708ms → last ⅓ avg 720ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 9–4
132Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 15infernoWeakest map · 42% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC26111542%-0.01
ancientS1512380%0.00
dust2B157847%-0.03
anubisB147750%-0.01
mirageS139469%-0.01
nukeC125742%-0.02
cache31233%-0.05
overpass21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

89Matches
55%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
77.6ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2250%0.9516.4
Dust22050%1.0015.2
Ancient1457%1.0016.4
Inferno1275%1.3414.3
Anubis757%0.7311.1
Nuke617%0.8913.5
Cache683%1.1514.5
Overpass250%0.7615.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
718msReaction time
10.6%T opening success
40.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
10.34HE damage / grenade
10.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 718.2607ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 10.5828% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno12–16-0.059%29 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0119%29 Aug
dust213–7-0.067%29 Aug
mirage10–130.0216%29 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0213%27 Aug
anubis5–13-0.1014%1 Aug
dust210–130.0123%31 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0218%23 Jul
dust216–140.0114%20 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0115%20 Jul
ancient13–60.0143%19 Jul
inferno9–130.0113%19 Jul
nuke3–10.0860%19 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0219%17 Jul
ancient13–5-0.042%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0830%17 Jul
cache11–13-0.087%12 Jul
mirage13–20.0623%12 Jul
cache13–9-0.0637%12 Jul
dust213–5-0.0827%10 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0216%10 Jul
mirage13–50.0535%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0233%10 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0112%9 Jul
inferno9–40.1236%8 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0424%6 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0613%4 Jul
inferno13–100.0019%3 Jul
inferno13–90.019%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0633%1 Jul
inferno4–9-0.064%27 Jun
anubis13–110.0322%26 Jun
inferno7–90.0124%25 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0720%24 Jun
mirage13–110.0430%15 Jun
overpass2–4-0.150%13 Jun
ancient13–50.0715%12 Jun
mirage3–8-0.0336%11 Jun
cache11–13-0.0216%9 Jun
anubis2–130.0326%9 Jun
anubis6–13-0.108%6 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0717%6 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0513%4 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0123%4 Jun
inferno7–9-0.0625%4 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0319%3 Jun
inferno4–9-0.1718%28 May
inferno13–11-0.0123%28 May
nuke4–6-0.0017%27 May
nuke13–8-0.0418%27 May
dust24–13-0.105%27 May
inferno13–70.0015%26 May
inferno5–13-0.037%26 May
anubis8–13-0.0218%26 May
ancient13–70.0426%26 May
ancient13–8-0.0024%25 May
dust211–130.0018%24 May
ancient13–80.0127%24 May
overpass13–70.0817%22 May
ancient4–13-0.0132%21 May
mirage3–13-0.0314%20 May
dust28–13-0.0626%20 May
ancient9–13-0.0617%17 May
dust216–130.0134%17 May
inferno13–60.0625%17 May
dust213–8-0.0324%17 May
anubis16–14-0.0430%17 May
inferno5–13-0.1113%9 May
nuke13–5-0.0119%9 May
inferno13–8-0.0116%6 May
inferno13–50.0323%5 May
ancient13–5-0.0039%5 May
anubis13–70.0316%5 May
dust213–9-0.0324%5 May
ancient15–15-0.0324%4 May
dust210–13-0.0016%4 May
dust213–100.0216%4 May
nuke13–100.0010%3 May
inferno13–40.0823%1 May
ancient16–14-0.0122%1 May
nuke5–13-0.0120%1 May
nuke13–7-0.0525%1 May
anubis11–130.0122%1 May
anubis12–3-0.015%30 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0218%30 Apr
ancient16–120.0414%29 Apr
anubis13–50.0324%29 Apr
anubis5–130.0015%29 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0416%29 Apr
dust210–13-0.0128%28 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0128%28 Apr
inferno13–110.0616%28 Apr
ancient13–50.0814%28 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0840%28 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0722%27 Apr
dust28–13-0.0611%27 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0527%27 Apr
mirage5–13-0.099%27 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0218%26 Apr
inferno13–100.0218%26 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →