Kamikaze !!

Kamikaze !! — CS2 Stats

76561199557389511[U:1:1597123783]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

49Tracked matches39%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
Premier CS Rating7,903Light Blue band · top ~64.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#44453 of 59827 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKamikaze !!PREMIER7,903 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning42
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY23202Last 4551%Win rateWWLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression4.6
Utility4.3
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.2
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time653ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 45 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–3
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B179853%0.03
mirageA116555%0.01
anubisD72529%-0.02
ancient43175%0.03
nuke31233%-0.01
inferno32167%0.03

Across the last 45 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
668msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
52.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
6.61HE damage / grenade
6.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7207% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.1018%28 Apr
dust213–10.029%28 Apr
mirage3–130.0131%28 Apr
dust213–16-0.0222%3 Mar
dust29–130.0226%3 Mar
anubis13–40.085%2 Mar
dust213–90.0723%1 Mar
anubis13–3-0.0515%1 Mar
dust21–13-0.0724%1 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0310%1 Mar
dust211–13-0.0213%28 Feb
mirage11–130.0118%28 Feb
dust215–150.069%28 Feb
nuke13–100.0219%25 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0927%25 Feb
ancient10–30.0324%25 Feb
dust25–13-0.0113%25 Feb
dust25–130.0527%25 Feb
ancient13–50.0625%23 Feb
mirage13–80.0316%23 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0712%23 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0319%22 Feb
anubis15–150.0316%22 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0419%22 Feb
mirage10–130.0113%22 Feb
inferno9–13-0.019%22 Feb
dust213–8-0.0520%22 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0310%22 Feb
dust210–13-0.029%22 Feb
dust213–30.1619%22 Feb
dust213–70.0210%22 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0128%21 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0427%21 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0318%21 Feb
ancient16–130.0513%21 Feb
mirage13–70.0520%21 Feb
mirage13–80.0414%20 Feb
dust213–70.0410%20 Feb
anubis12–16-0.0020%20 Feb
dust213–110.0521%20 Feb
inferno13–70.1019%20 Feb
mirage13–40.0027%20 Feb
dust213–70.0813%20 Feb
nuke6–13-0.018%19 Feb
mirage13–90.019%19 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →