most humble

most humble — CS2 Stats

CA76561199529629261[U:1:1569363533]Steam profile ↗

870Tracked matches53%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 981 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmost humbleFACEITLevel 5 · 981 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning46
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4852Last 10048%Win rateWLLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression4.9
Utility4.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time575ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 8–0
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5overpassWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A31181358%0.00
mirageB23111248%-0.03
ancientD124833%-0.02
cacheB84450%0.03
nukeC83538%-0.03
infernoA74357%-0.02
overpassD61517%-0.01
anubisA53260%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

365Matches
49%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10750%0.9814.8
Dust29250%1.0514.8
Inferno4347%1.0115.5
Ancient3847%0.9014.7
Nuke3551%1.1116.8
Anubis3047%1.0116.0
Cache1145%1.0813.6
Overpass956%0.9213.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.9%Spray accuracy
87.9%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
577msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
6.43HE damage / grenade
10.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4926 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.5532% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0620%3 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0422%3 Aug
cache11–13-0.0213%31 Jul
ancient4–13-0.074%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0213%31 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0312%31 Jul
dust213–80.0128%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0012%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0118%29 Jul
cache7–13-0.0611%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0324%29 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0525%29 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0718%28 Jul
dust213–4-0.0229%28 Jul
mirage14–160.0213%26 Jul
cache13–20.0914%26 Jul
dust213–50.0422%23 Jul
dust210–13-0.0216%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.059%22 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0315%20 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0212%18 Jul
anubis13–80.037%17 Jul
dust211–13-0.079%11 Jul
dust29–130.0214%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0419%10 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0612%9 Jul
dust213–4-0.0027%9 Jul
inferno6–13-0.068%8 Jul
cache13–70.0818%8 Jul
cache13–60.0219%7 Jul
cache9–130.0113%7 Jul
cache6–130.0635%7 Jul
cache13–10.0422%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0510%1 Jul
inferno13–110.0820%30 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0114%30 Jun
overpass13–70.029%27 Jun
dust213–11-0.0113%26 Jun
dust26–13-0.0111%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.0218%26 Jun
dust213–90.0613%26 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0713%26 Jun
dust213–7-0.0210%25 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0011%25 Jun
anubis13–30.0214%25 Jun
nuke13–100.008%23 Jun
overpass5–130.0114%23 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0412%19 Jun
nuke8–130.018%19 Jun
dust29–13-0.0514%19 Jun
inferno13–7-0.027%18 Jun
dust213–10-0.0211%16 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0412%16 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0214%15 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0210%13 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0317%13 Jun
dust29–130.0520%12 Jun
mirage11–13-0.026%12 Jun
dust216–120.0122%10 Jun
dust211–13-0.0320%10 Jun
dust213–90.0521%8 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0013%7 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0415%6 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0516%4 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0420%3 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0512%3 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0315%2 Jun
mirage2–12-0.088%2 Jun
mirage13–11-0.048%2 Jun
dust213–11-0.0113%31 May
dust213–5-0.0113%30 May
mirage13–60.058%30 May
mirage2–13-0.1214%29 May
mirage13–4-0.078%29 May
overpass5–13-0.0819%29 May
ancient13–90.0118%28 May
dust27–13-0.0219%28 May
overpass9–130.0117%28 May
ancient10–13-0.0420%28 May
overpass10–13-0.0114%28 May
dust213–90.0116%28 May
ancient14–160.0420%27 May
dust213–100.0215%27 May
mirage13–90.0211%27 May
ancient7–13-0.0313%26 May
dust213–100.026%26 May
ancient3–13-0.038%25 May
inferno9–13-0.0216%25 May
dust28–13-0.0711%25 May
mirage8–130.0318%25 May
mirage9–13-0.0113%24 May
nuke6–13-0.085%24 May
ancient13–80.0110%24 May
ancient13–10-0.069%24 May
nuke13–80.0421%23 May
overpass7–13-0.028%23 May
mirage11–130.0019%23 May
dust28–00.1114%22 May
dust213–100.0110%22 May
dust211–13-0.0120%22 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →