BigBack♿ — CS2 Stats

76561199511118242[U:1:1550852514]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

694Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating2.5 Learning

Premier CS Rating2,585Grey band · top ~89% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9970 of 12993 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver IV

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim24

Positioning17

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLLWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.4

Aggression0.7

Utility4.9

Positioning1.7

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 703ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.4

Positioning1.7

Utility4.9

Mechanics3.8

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact3.9

Composite 2.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.07−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.07

Reaction time696ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 709ms → last ⅓ avg 696ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.0%

first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–11

13–0Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	37	18–19	49%	-0.05
mirage	C	36	15–21	42%	-0.06
nuke	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.03
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.05
anubis	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.04
ancient	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.03
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

275Matches

45%Win rate

0.64Avg K/D

62.5ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	100	48%	0.68	11.3
Dust2	53	43%	0.59	10.0
Ancient	37	43%	0.62	11.0
Anubis	25	48%	0.63	10.9
Inferno	23	52%	0.68	12.2
Nuke	21	29%	0.55	9.8
Overpass	6	83%	0.88	16.3
Train	3	67%	0.59	12.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy

24.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.2%Spray accuracy

67.1%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

703msReaction time

18.1%T opening success

20.1%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

7.9%Flash assists

4.96HE damage / grenade

14.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 703.4667ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.1463% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	14–16	-0.09	9%	27 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.08	10%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	9%	27 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	13%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	26%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–0	-0.02	27%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.11	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	11%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	29%	24 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	14%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	16%	24 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	0%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	11%	24 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.12	6%	24 Jul →
mirage	1–8	-0.09	33%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.08	28%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.09	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	13%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.10	25%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.12	20%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	9%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.10	11%	22 Jul →
dust2	3–12	-0.06	26%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.06	19%	22 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.13	0%	22 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	24%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.06	14%	22 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.08	9%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	12%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.00	14%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.07	12%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	19%	22 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	17%	21 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	29%	21 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	38%	21 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.09	26%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	14%	21 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.13	0%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	15%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.08	8%	21 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	22%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	14%	20 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.05	12%	20 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	15%	19 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	6%	19 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	40%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.10	21%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	10%	19 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	10%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–2	-0.05	12%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.06	21%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.09	28%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.02	16%	19 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	8%	18 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.08	22%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.05	32%	18 Jul →
inferno	12–16	-0.01	13%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	13%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	23%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.05	25%	18 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	8%	17 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.14	0%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.10	26%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	23%	17 Jul →
cache	1–7	-0.06	17%	17 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.10	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.08	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	20%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	17%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	4%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.12	25%	16 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.06	16%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	22%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	14%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.09	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	5–8	-0.00	5%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	21%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	14%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	14%	14 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	4%	14 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.07	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	18%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	24%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.06	6%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	6%	13 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.03	9%	13 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	13%	13 Jul →