gustply — CS2 Stats

76561199500971545[U:1:1540705817]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

637Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning55

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression6.3

Utility5.6

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning5.5

Utility5.6

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time599ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms

Headshot accuracy25.2%+2.4%

first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–0

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

12–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	37	23–14	62%	-0.00
mirage	C	27	12–15	44%	-0.00
cache	S	9	6–3	67%	0.00
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.01
inferno	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.03
anubis	S	6	5–1	83%	0.00
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.07
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

346Matches

51%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

81.6ADR

57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	110	51%	1.09	16.3
Mirage	86	48%	1.03	16.1
Inferno	39	54%	1.00	16.3
Ancient	36	53%	1.07	16.4
Anubis	33	58%	1.07	15.7
Cache	25	40%	0.98	17.0
Nuke	12	67%	1.01	15.0
Overpass	5	20%	1.08	18.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.5%Spray accuracy

76.2%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

597msReaction time

26.2%T opening success

48.7%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

9.0%Flash assists

10.35HE damage / grenade

6.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.2397% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	15–19	-0.05	33%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	25%	22 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	16%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.07	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.10	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	21%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	27%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	23%	17 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	36%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	45%	16 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	30%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	29%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.09	21%	16 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.01	38%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.07	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	31%	15 Aug →
train	12–12	-0.05	22%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	21%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	25%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	41%	12 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	27%	11 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	18%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	26%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	17–19	-0.01	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	19%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	30%	8 Aug →
anubis	16–12	-0.03	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	25%	8 Aug →
debris	9–4	-0.04	16%	8 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	34%	8 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.06	23%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	27%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.09	29%	4 Aug →
ancient	22–18	-0.01	19%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	23%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.10	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	24%	3 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.00	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	22%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	11%	1 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	29%	1 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	35%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	19%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.08	43%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	21%	27 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	14%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	40%	25 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	21%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	34%	23 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	33%	23 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	31%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	18%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	20%	21 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.00	23%	20 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	36%	20 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	21%	20 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	24%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	25%	19 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.00	34%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	39%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	25%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.01	24%	18 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	27%	18 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	33%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.07	21%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	27%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	40%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.04	34%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	34%	17 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	23%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	17%	17 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	36%	16 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	18%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	13%	16 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	14%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	25%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	17%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.14	32%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	20%	14 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	16%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	32%	14 Jul →
cache	28–25	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–2	-0.00	28%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	22%	13 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.05	11%	12 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	15%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.07	16%	12 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	24%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	15%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	17%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	27%	11 Jul →