ChillGamer21 — CS2 Stats

76561199494432999[U:1:1534167271]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,176Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning61

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–41Last 10059%Win rateWWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression8.9

Utility5.0

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.1

Utility5.0

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time575ms+17ms

first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — mirage 13–0

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

W2Current streak

12–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

18Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 36dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	36	26–10	72%	0.03
ancient	S	25	17–8	68%	0.03
anubis	D	12	4–8	33%	0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	0.05
dust2	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.00
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,425Matches

52%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

97.3ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	986	54%	1.32	20.2
Ancient	410	51%	1.25	19.7
Dust2	313	46%	1.15	17.9
Anubis	277	52%	1.21	19.0
Nuke	197	48%	1.32	20.2
Inferno	122	50%	1.12	17.7
Overpass	51	45%	1.24	20.7
Vertigo	37	54%	1.21	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

84.7%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

567msReaction time

34.4%T opening success

57.7%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

13.3%Flash assists

10.02HE damage / grenade

4.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.4169% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–8	-0.05	7%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	27%	26 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.08	13%	23 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	20%	23 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	17%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	10%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	27%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	11%	16 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.01	18%	16 Aug →
inferno	20–22	0.05	13%	12 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.02	26%	10 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	29%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.05	16%	6 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	17%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	16%	4 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.03	16%	3 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.03	25%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	22%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	8%	3 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.04	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	23%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	34%	2 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	32%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.02	9%	28 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	22%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	18%	24 Jul →
ancient	22–18	0.00	19%	23 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.00	21%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–16	0.03	14%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	25%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.00	14%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	16%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.06	21%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.05	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.22	57%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.12	13%	10 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	21%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.04	13%	9 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	22%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	6%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	13%	7 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	19%	7 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	22%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	14%	6 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	16%	4 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.05	18%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	8%	3 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	17%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.14	18%	1 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.02	30%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.07	14%	26 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	25%	26 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	23%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.08	15%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	17%	22 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.09	24%	20 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	17%	19 Jun →
ancient	19–15	0.07	20%	16 Jun →
ancient	22–20	0.01	23%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	18%	10 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	18%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.13	30%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	18%	8 Jun →
overpass	14–16	-0.06	19%	7 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.01	28%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.05	22%	5 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.08	10%	4 Jun →
ancient	12–16	0.00	19%	4 Jun →
nuke	16–14	0.02	50%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.08	21%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.09	19%	3 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.01	18%	3 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	13%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.15	23%	27 May →
ancient	13–11	0.07	16%	26 May →
ancient	13–6	0.06	26%	25 May →
mirage	13–9	0.12	9%	25 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	17%	25 May →
dust2	13–8	0.05	5%	25 May →
mirage	13–7	0.11	27%	24 May →
anubis	13–16	0.03	15%	24 May →
anubis	17–19	0.08	23%	24 May →
nuke	13–4	0.09	24%	23 May →
mirage	13–9	0.05	14%	23 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.05	23%	23 May →
mirage	10–13	0.01	13%	22 May →
mirage	16–14	0.07	16%	21 May →
ancient	13–7	0.08	28%	20 May →
mirage	13–11	0.05	15%	19 May →
nuke	13–7	0.05	17%	17 May →
mirage	13–9	0.01	22%	17 May →
dust2	7–13	0.01	20%	16 May →
ancient	13–4	0.05	17%	15 May →
mirage	13–5	0.03	14%	15 May →
mirage	13–11	0.07	21%	14 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	10%	14 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	23%	14 May →
ancient	8–13	0.09	15%	13 May →
nuke	13–9	0.12	19%	12 May →
overpass	4–13	-0.02	15%	11 May →